Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34186462›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2021

Avoiding monetary loss: A human habenula functional MRI ultra-high field study.

Kathrin Weidacker, Seung-Goo Kim, Camilla L Nord, Catarina Rua, Christopher T Rodgers, Valerie Voon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Habenula-ventral tegmental area functional coupling and risk aversion in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aversive motivation and cognitive control.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrin WeidackerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Seung-Goo KimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Camilla L NordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Catarina RuaWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christopher T RodgersWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Valerie VoonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: vv247@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBDuke University · USMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/12Medical Research Council MR/M008983/1Medical Research Council MR/P008747/1Medical Research Council SUAG/043 G101400Wellcome Trust 098436/Z/12/B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of convergent human neuroimaging and animal studies suggest that habenula neurons fire in anticipation of non-rewarding outcomes, and suppress their firing in anticipation of rewarding outcomes. This normative function of the habenula appears disrupted in depression, and may be critical to the anti-depressant effects of ketamine. However, studying habenula functionality in humans using standard 3 T MRI is inherently limited by its small size. We employed ultra-high field (7 T) fMRI to investigate habenular activity in eighteen healthy volunteers during a Monetary Incentive Delay Task, focussing on loss avoidance, monetary loss and neutral events. We assessed neural activation in the field of view (FOV) in addition to ROI-based habenula-specific activity and generalized task-dependent functional connectivity. Whole FOV results indicated substantial neural differences between monetary loss and neutral outcomes, as well as between loss avoidance and neutral outcomes. Habenula-specific analyses showed bilateral deactivation during loss avoidance, compared to other outcomes. This first investigation into the habenula's role during loss avoidance revealed that the left habenula further differentiated between loss avoidance and monetary loss. Functional connectivity between the right habenula and the ipsilateral hippocampus and subcallosal cingulate (regions implicated in memory and depression pathophysiology) was enhanced when anticipating potential losses compared to anticipating neutral outcomes. Our findings suggest that the human habenula responds most strongly to outcomes of loss avoidance when compared to neutral and monetary losses, suggesting a role for the habenula in both reward and aversive processing. This has critical relevance to understanding the pathophysiology of habenula function in mood and other neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as the mechanism of action of habenula-targeting antidepressants such as ketamine.

Indexed as

HabenulaAnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotivationNeuroimagingRewardFunctional connectivityHabenulaLoss avoidanceMonetary incentive delay taskReward processing

Identifiers

PMID34186462
PMCPMC8422162
OpenAlexW3172218325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.