Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185844›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2021

Modified scoping review of the enablers and barriers to implementing primary health care in the COVID-19 context.

Alexandra Edelman, Robert Marten, Hernán Montenegro, Kabir Sheikh, Shannon Barkley, Abdul Ghaffar, Suraya Dalil, Stephanie M Topp

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reorienting health systems towards Primary Health Care in South Asia.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra EdelmanCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-5266
Robert MartenAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Hernán MontenegroSpecial Programme on Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kabir SheikhAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Shannon BarkleySpecial Programme on Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-9453
Abdul GhaffarAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Switzerland.
Suraya DalilSpecial Programme on Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephanie M ToppCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3448-7983

Funding

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research N/AWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the Alma Ata Declaration of 1978, countries have varied in their progress towards establishing and sustaining comprehensive primary health care (PHC) and realizing its associated vision of 'Health for All'. International health emergencies such as the coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic underscore the importance of PHC in underpinning health equity, including via access to routine essential services and emergency responsiveness. This review synthesizes the current state of knowledge about PHC impacts, implementation enablers and barriers, and knowledge gaps across the three main PHC components as conceptualized in the 2018 Astana Framework. A scoping review design was adopted to summarize evidence from a diverse body of literature with a modification to accommodate four discrete phases of searching, screening and eligibility assessment: a database search in PubMed for PHC-related literature reviews and multi-country analyses (Phase 1); a website search for key global PHC synthesis reports (Phase 2); targeted searches for peer-reviewed literature relating to specific components of PHC (Phase 3) and searches for emerging insights relating to PHC in the COVID-19 context (Phase 4). Evidence from 96 included papers were analysed across deductive themes corresponding to the three main components of PHC. Findings affirm that investments in PHC improve equity and access, healthcare performance, accountability of health systems and health outcomes. Key enablers of PHC implementation include equity-informed financing models, health system and governance frameworks that differentiate multi-sectoral PHC from more discrete service-focussed primary care, and governance mechanisms that strengthen linkages between policymakers, civil society, non-governmental organizations, community-based organizations and private sector entities. Although knowledge about, and experience in, PHC implementation continues to grow, critical knowledge gaps are evident, particularly relating to country-level, context-specific governance, financing, workforce, accountability and service coordination mechanisms. An agenda to guide future country-specific PHC research is outlined.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2community engagementcomprehensiveCOVID-19multi-sectoralPrimary health caresocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID34185844
PMCPMC8344743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.