Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185784›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Assessment of Trinidad community stakeholder perspectives on the use of yeast interfering RNA-baited ovitraps for biorational control of Aedes mosquitoes.

Nikhella Winter, Akilah T M Stewart, Jessica Igiede, Rachel M Wiltshire, Limb K Hapairai, Lester D James, Azad Mohammed, David W Severson, Molly Duman-Scheel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikhella WinterDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Akilah T M StewartDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Jessica IgiedeEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Rachel M WiltshireEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-4883
Limb K HapairaiEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Lester D JamesDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Azad MohammedDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
David W SeversonDepartment of Life Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Molly Duman-ScheelEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1254-5369
University of Notre Dame · USUniversity of the West Indies · TT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue, Zika, chikungunya and yellow fever viruses continue to be a major public health burden. Aedes mosquitoes, the primary vectors responsible for transmitting these viral pathogens, continue to flourish due to local challenges in vector control management. Yeast interfering RNA-baited larval lethal ovitraps are being developed as a novel biorational control tool for Aedes mosquitoes. This intervention circumvents increasing issues with insecticide resistance and poses no known threat to non-target organisms. In an effort to create public awareness of this alternative vector control strategy, gain stakeholder feedback regarding product design and acceptance of the new intervention, and build capacity for its potential integration into existing mosquito control programs, this investigation pursued community stakeholder engagement activities, which were undertaken in Trinidad and Tobago. Three forms of assessment, including paper surveys, community forums, and household interviews, were used with the goal of evaluating local community stakeholders' knowledge of mosquitoes, vector control practices, and perceptions of the new technology. These activities facilitated evaluation of the hypothesis that the ovitraps would be broadly accepted by community stakeholders as a means of biorational control for Aedes mosquitoes. A comparison of the types of stakeholder input communicated through use of the three assessment tools highlighted the utility and merit of using each tool for assessing new global health interventions. Most study participants reported a general willingness to purchase an ovitrap on condition that it would be affordable and safe for human health and the environment. Stakeholders provided valuable input on product design, distribution, and operation. A need for educational campaigns that provide a mechanism for educating stakeholders about vector ecology and management was highlighted. The results of the investigation, which are likely applicable to many other Caribbean nations and other countries with heavy arboviral disease burdens, were supportive of supplementation of existing vector control strategies through the use of the yeast RNAi-based ovitraps.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsFemaleHumansMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsOvipositionRNA, Small InterferingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeStakeholder ParticipationTrinidad and TobagoVirus DiseasesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID34185784
PMCPMC8241094
OpenAlexW3174762026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.