Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185678›Full record

ArticleCancer research2021

NCI Imaging Data Commons.

Andrey Fedorov, William J R Longabaugh, David Pot, David A Clunie, Steve Pieper, Hugo J W L Aerts, André Homeyer, Rob Lewis, Afshin Akbarzadeh, Dennis Bontempi and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. MedImg: An Integrated Database for Public Medical Images.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Iris File Extension.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Andrey FedorovBrigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. fedorov@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-9413
William J R LongabaughInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
David PotGeneral Dynamics, Bethesda, Maryland.
David A CluniePixelMed Publishing LLC, Bangor, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2406-1145
Steve PieperIsomics Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4193-9578
Hugo J W L AertsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
André HomeyerFraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9910-7136
Rob LewisRadical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts.
Afshin AkbarzadehBrigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dennis BontempiArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
William CliffordInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
Markus D HerrmannMassachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-9205
Henning HöfenerFraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-0234
Igor OctavianoRadical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-1480
Chad OsborneGeneral Dynamics, Bethesda, Maryland.
Suzanne PaquetteInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
James PettsOvela Solutions LTD, London, United Kingdom.
Davide PunzoRadical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts.
Madelyn ReyesGeneral Dynamics, Bethesda, Maryland.
Daniela P SchachererFraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-3742
Mi TianInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
George WhiteInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
Erik ZieglerRadical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ilya ShmulevichInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.
Todd PihlFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-3300
Ulrike WagnerFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland.
Keyvan FarahaniNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ron KikinisBrigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7227-7058

Funding

Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
TRD 3 - Enabling Technologies for Intraprocedural GuidanceP41EB028741 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Oliver Jonas · 2021 to 2026
$10.7M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000031CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500001GNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500001WNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003INIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Research Data Commons (CRDC) aims to establish a national cloud-based data science infrastructure. Imaging Data Commons (IDC) is a new component of CRDC supported by the Cancer Moonshot. The goal of IDC is to enable a broad spectrum of cancer researchers, with and without imaging expertise, to easily access and explore the value of deidentified imaging data and to support integrated analyses with nonimaging data. We achieve this goal by colocating versatile imaging collections with cloud-based computing resources and data exploration, visualization, and analysis tools. The IDC pilot was released in October 2020 and is being continuously populated with radiology and histopathology collections. IDC provides access to curated imaging collections, accompanied by documentation, a user forum, and a growing number of analysis use cases that aim to demonstrate the value of a data commons framework applied to cancer imaging research. SIGNIFICANCE: This study introduces NCI Imaging Data Commons, a new repository of the NCI Cancer Research Data Commons, which will support cancer imaging research on the cloud.

Indexed as

National Cancer Institute (U.S.)Biomedical ResearchCloud ComputingComputational BiologyComputer GraphicsComputer SecurityDatabases, FactualData Interpretation, StatisticalDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsProgramming LanguagesRadiologyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34185678
PMCPMC8373794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.