Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185242›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurovirology2021

Psychometric utility of the international HIV dementia scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in HIV-associated asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment.

Stephen L Aita, Quanhathai Kaewpoowat, Saowaluck Yasri, Amaraporn Rerkasem, Kittipan Rerkasem, Janejit Choovuthayakorn, Somsanguan Ausayakhun, Kevin Robertson, Robert M Roth, Nathaniel M Robbins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurovirology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen L AitaDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, NH, Hanover, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-3247
Quanhathai KaewpoowatDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Saowaluck YasriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Amaraporn RerkasemResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kittipan RerkasemResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Janejit ChoovuthayakornDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Somsanguan AusayakhunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kevin RobertsonDepartment of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, USA.
Robert M RothDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, NH, Hanover, USA.
Nathaniel M RobbinsDepartment of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, NH, Hanover, USA. Nathaniel.M.Robbins@dartmouth.edu.
Chiang Mai University · THDartmouth College · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

SYNERGY: The Dartmouth Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001086 · NCATS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GREEN, ALAN I · 2013 to 2017
$18.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing need for brief screening measures for HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). We compared two commonly used measures (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] and the International HIV Dementia Scale [IHDS]) in their ability to identify asymptomatic HAND (i.e., asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment [ANI]). Participants included 74 Thai PLWH: 38 met Frascati criteria for ANI and 36 were cognitively normal (CN). Participants completed Thai language versions of the MoCA (MoCA-T) and IHDS, and a validated neurocognitive battery. We examined between-group differences for MoCA-T and IHDS total scores, and scale subcomponents. We also conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine the ability of the MoCA-T and IHDS to discriminate between CN and ANI groups, and compared their area under the curve (AUC) values. Results revealed lower MoCA-T total score, as well as the Visuospatial/Executive and Delayed Recall subtask scores, in the ANI relative to CN group. Groups did not differ on the IHDS. For ROC analyses, the MoCA-T, but not the IHDS, significantly differentiated the ANI from CN group, and there was a significant difference in AUC values between the MoCA-T (AUC = .71) and IHDS (AUC = .56). Sensitivity and specificity statistics were poor for both screening measures. These data indicate while the MoCA-T functions better than the IHDS in detecting Thai PLWH with ANI, the mildest form of HAND, neither cognitive screener, showed strong utility. Our findings reflect the limited efficacy of common screening measures in detecting subtler cognitive deficits among Thai PLWH, and highlight the need for better screening tools.

Indexed as

LanguageMental Status and Dementia TestsTranslatingAdultAIDS Dementia ComplexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSensitivity and SpecificityThailandCognitive ImpairmentHIVHIV DementiaIHDSMoCANeuropsychology

Identifiers

PMID34185242
OpenAlexW3176566591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.