ArticleBrain topography2021
Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Article in Brain topography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2024Article
- Investigating the effect of cochlear implant usage metrics on cortical auditory-evoked potential responses in adult recipients post-implantation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory steady-state evoked potentials (SS-EPs) are phase-locked neural responses to periodic stimuli, believed to reflect specific neural generators. As an objective measure, steady-state responses have been used in different clinical settings, including measuring hearing thresholds of normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Recent studies are in favor of recording these responses as a part of the cochlear implant (CI) device-fitting procedure. Considering these potential benefits, the goals of the present study were to assess the feasibility of recording free-field SS-EPs in CI users and to compare their characteristics between CI users and controls. By taking advantage of a recently developed dual-frequency tagging method, we attempted to record subcortical and cortical SS-EPs from adult CI users and controls and measured reliable subcortical and cortical SS-EPs in the control group. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to remove CI stimulation artifacts, yet subcortical responses of several CIs were heavily contaminated by these artifacts. Consequently, only cortical SS-EPs were compared between groups, which were found to be larger in the controls. The lower cortical SS-EPs' amplitude in CI users might indicate a reduction in neural synchrony evoked by the modulation rate of the auditory input across different neural assemblies in the auditory pathway. The brain topographies of cortical auditory SS-EPs, the time course of cortical responses, and the reconstructed cortical maps were highly similar between groups, confirming their neural origin and possibility to obtain such responses also in CI recipients. As for subcortical SS-EPs, our results highlight a need for sophisticated denoising algorithms to pinpoint and remove artifactual components from the biological response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.