ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Effect of age and sex on fully automated deep learning assessment of left ventricular function, volumes, and contours in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning algorithms for left ventricle (LV) segmentation are prone to bias towards the training dataset. This study assesses sex- and age-dependent performance differences when using deep learning for automatic LV segmentation. Retrospective analysis of 100 healthy subjects undergoing cardiac MRI from 2012 to 2018, with 10 men and women in the following age groups: 18-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, and 61-80 years old. Subjects underwent 1.5 T, 2D CINE SSFP MRI. 35 pathologic cases from local clinical exams and the SCMR 2015 consensus contours dataset were also analyzed. A fully convolutional network (FCN) similar to U-Net trained on the U.K. Biobank was used to automatically segment LV endocardial and epicardial contours. FCN and manual segmentation were compared using Dice metrics and measurements of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), mass (LVM), and ejection fraction (LVEF). Paired t-tests and linear regressions were used to analyze measurement differences with respect to sex and age. Dice metrics (median ± IQR) for n = 135 cases were 0.94 ± 0.04/0.87 ± 0.10 (ED endocardium/ES endocardium). Measurement biases (mean ± SD) among the healthy cohort were - 0.3 ± 10.1 mL for EDV, - 6.7 ± 9.6 mL for ESV, 4.6 ± 6.4% for LVEF, and - 2.2 ± 11.0 g for LVM; biases were independent of sex and age. Biases among the 35 pathologic cases were 0.1 ± 19 mL for EDV, - 4.8 ± 19 mL for ESV, 2.0 ± 7.6% for LVEF, and 1.0 ± 20 g for LVM. In conclusion, automatic segmentation by the Biobank-trained FCN was independent of age and sex. Improvements in end-systolic basal slice detection are needed to decrease bias and improve precision in ESV and LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.