Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185143›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Mild and moderate COVID-19 disease does not affect hearing function permanently: a cross-sectional study ınvolving young and middle-aged healthcare givers.

Kerem Kökoğlu, Nezaket Tektaş, Fidan Elif Baktir-Okcesiz, Mehmet İlhan Şahin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long COVID, audiovestibular symptoms and persistent chemosensory dysfunction: a systematic review of the current evidence.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Impact of COVID-19 Medication (Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine) on High Frequency Hearing.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Hearing loss and the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC research notes · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerem KökoğluDepartment of Otolaryngology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey.
Nezaket TektaşDepartment of Otolaryngology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey.
Fidan Elif Baktir-OkcesizDepartment of Otolaryngology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey.
Mehmet İlhan ŞahinDepartment of Otolaryngology, Erciyes University School of Medicine, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey. misahin@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9576-1448
Erciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the hearing function of patients with mild and moderate COVID-19.

methodsThe hospital staffs recovered from COVID-19 were included. The candidates who had an ear disease or progressive hearing loss prior to COVID-19, or having been hospitalised because of severe and critical COVID-19 were excluded. The age, sex, symptoms during COVID-19, and medications received for the disease were noted. The hearing thresholds (HT) of the participants who had an audiogram before having COVID-19 disease were recorded. A pure tone audiometry was conducted to all. The participants were classified into two groups; Group 1: participants who had an audiogram previously, Group 2: participants who didn't have an audiogram previously. The changes of the HTs of the participants in Group 1 were analyzed. The HTs of the participants in Group 2 were documented without any comparison. The HTs of all participants were also analyzed by classifying them into subgroups according to their symptoms during, and medications received for COVID-19.

resultsFifty-four males and 47 females (18-59 years) were included. The participants' HTs in Group 1 (n = 31) did not change significantly at any of the frequencies after having COVID-19 (p > 0.05). The pure tone averages of the participants in Group 2 (n = 70) were below 25 dB and none of the participants reported worsening of their hearing permanently. The differences between the HTs of none of the subgroups were statistically significant (p > 0.05, p > 0.05).

conclusionsMild and moderate COVID-19 and its treatments did not affect the hearing function permanently.

Indexed as

COVID-19Audiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHearingHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34185143
PMCPMC8238665
OpenAlexW3176238143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.