Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185067›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of Annual Intensive Care Unit Sepsis Caseload With Hospital Mortality From Sepsis in the United Kingdom, 2010-2016.

Ritesh Maharaj, Alistair McGuire, Andrew Street

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05833412 (Clinical Study to Improve the Quality of Care in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Sepsis Through Early Molecular Diagnosis .), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05833412 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Study to Improve the Quality of Care in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Sepsis Through Early Molecular Diagnosis .

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAlejandro Rodriguez Oviedo , MDRan2023 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsSepsis, Molecular DiagnosisArmsSepticyte Rapid ®, FilmArray® blood culture identification (BCID2®)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ritesh MaharajDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Alistair McGuireDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Andrew StreetDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Sepsis is associated with a high burden of inpatient mortality. Treatment in intensive care units (ICUs) that have more experience treating patients with sepsis may be associated with lower mortality. Objective: To assess the association between the volume of patients with sepsis receiving care in an ICU and hospital mortality from sepsis in the UK. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from adult patients with sepsis from 231 UK ICUs between 2010 and 2016. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme database. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016. Exposures: Annual sepsis case volume in an ICU in the year of a patient's admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital mortality after ICU admission for sepsis assessed using a mixed-effects logistic model in a 3-level hierarchical structure based on the number of individual patients nested in years nested within ICUs. Results: Among 273 001 patients included in the analysis, the median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 53-76 years), 148 149 (54.3%) were male, and 248 275 (91.0%) were White. The mean ICNARC-2018 illness severity score was 21.0 (95% CI, 20.9-21.0). Septic shock accounted for 19.3% of patient admissions, and 54.3% of patients required mechanical ventilation. The median annual sepsis volume per ICU was 242 cases (interquartile range, 177-334 cases). The study identified a significant association between the volume of sepsis cases in the ICU and mortality from sepsis; in the logistic regression model, hospital mortality was significantly lower among patients admitted to ICUs in the highest quartile of sepsis volume compared with the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96; P = .002). With volume modeled as a restricted cubic spline, treatment in a larger ICU was associated with lower hospital mortality. A lower annual volume threshold of 215 patients above which hospital mortality decreased significantly was found; 38.8% of patients were treated in ICUs below this threshold volume. There was no significant interaction between ICU volume and severity of illness as described by the ICNARC-2018 score (β [SE], -0.00014 [0.00024]; P = .57). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that patients with sepsis in the UK have higher odds of survival if they are treated in an ICU with a larger sepsis case volume. The benefit of a high sepsis case volume was not associated with the severity of the sepsis episode.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSepsisUnited KingdomWorkload

Identifiers

PMID34185067
PMCPMC8243236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.