Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34185005›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

A Word Pair Dataset for Semantic Similarity and Relatedness in Korean Medical Vocabulary: Reference Development and Validation.

Yunjin Yum, Jeong Moon Lee, Moon Joung Jang, Yoojoong Kim, Jong-Ho Kim, Seongtae Kim, Unsub Shin, Sanghoun Song, Hyung Joon Joo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunjin YumDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3070-3615
Jeong Moon LeeKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-4561
Moon Joung JangKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-4254
Yoojoong KimKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6615-9116
Jong-Ho KimKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1309-0821
Seongtae KimDepartment of Linguistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-323X
Unsub ShinDepartment of Linguistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9744-5206
Sanghoun Song *Department of Linguistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4234-232X
Hyung Joon Joo *Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-8464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fact that medical terms require special expertise and are becoming increasingly complex makes it difficult to employ natural language processing techniques in medical informatics. Several human-validated reference standards for medical terms have been developed to evaluate word embedding models using the semantic similarity and relatedness of medical word pairs. However, there are very few reference standards in non-English languages. In addition, because the existing reference standards were developed a long time ago, there is a need to develop an updated standard to represent recent findings in medical sciences.

objectiveWe propose a new Korean word pair reference set to verify embedding models.

methodsFrom January 2010 to December 2020, 518 medical textbooks, 72,844 health information news, and 15,698 medical research articles were collected, and the top 10,000 medical terms were selected to develop medical word pairs. Attending physicians (n=16) participated in the verification of the developed set with 607 word pairs.

resultsThe proportion of word pairs answered by all participants was 90.8% (551/607) for the similarity task and 86.5% (525/605) for the relatedness task. The similarity and relatedness of the word pair showed a high correlation (ρ=0.70, P<.001). The intraclass correlation coefficients to assess the interrater agreements of the word pair sets were 0.47 on the similarity task and 0.53 on the relatedness task. The final reference standard was 604 word pairs for the similarity task and 599 word pairs for relatedness, excluding word pairs with answers corresponding to outliers and word pairs that were answered by less than 50% of all the respondents. When FastText models were applied to the final reference standard word pair sets, the embedding models learning medical documents had a higher correlation between the calculated cosine similarity scores compared to human-judged similarity and relatedness scores (namu, ρ=0.12 vs with medical text for the similarity task, ρ=0.47; namu, ρ=0.02 vs with medical text for the relatedness task, ρ=0.30).

conclusionsKorean medical word pair reference standard sets for semantic similarity and relatedness were developed based on medical documents from the past 10 years. It is expected that our word pair reference sets will be actively utilized in the development of medical and multilingual natural language processing technology in the future.

Indexed as

fastTextKoreanmedical word pairrelatednesssimilarityword embedding

Identifiers

PMID34185005
PMCPMC8277378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.