ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
Discovery of Depression-Associated Factors From a Nationwide Population-Based Survey: Epidemiological Study Using Machine Learning and Network Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in the analysis of mental health at work: a scoping review.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- Predicting depression risk with machine learning models: identifying familial, personal, and dietary determinants.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Temporal trends and machine learning prediction of depressive symptoms among Chinese middle-aged and elderly individuals: a national cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Explainable Machine Learning in the Prediction of Depression.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors and Reasons Associated with Hesitating to Seek Care for Migraine: Results of the OVERCOME (US) Study.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Identifying major depressive disorder among US adults living alone using stacked ensemble machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Identifying depression with mixed features: the potential value of eye-tracking features.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Prediction of the acceptance of telemedicine among rheumatic patients: a machine learning-powered secondary analysis of German survey data.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Major Depression: Oldies but Goodies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of nutritional status and clinical depression classification using an explainable machine learning method.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Lifestyle, Demographic and Socio-Economic Determinants of Mental Health Disorders of Employees in the European Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Dynamic Prediction of Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcome for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Validation of the accuracy of the childhood asthma model for clinical decision support: a study protocol.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in lung cancer: Application of severity-adjustment method.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn epidemiological studies, finding the best subset of factors is challenging when the number of explanatory variables is large.
objectiveOur study had two aims. First, we aimed to identify essential depression-associated factors using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) machine learning algorithm from big survey data (the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2012-2016). Second, we aimed to achieve a comprehensive understanding of multifactorial features in depression using network analysis.
methodsAn XGBoost model was trained and tested to classify "current depression" and "no lifetime depression" for a data set of 120 variables for 12,596 cases. The optimal XGBoost hyperparameters were set by an automated machine learning tool (TPOT), and a high-performance sparse model was obtained by feature selection using the feature importance value of XGBoost. We performed statistical tests on the model and nonmodel factors using survey-weighted multiple logistic regression and drew a correlation network among factors. We also adopted statistical tests for the confounder or interaction effect of selected risk factors when it was suspected on the network.
resultsThe XGBoost-derived depression model consisted of 18 factors with an area under the weighted receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86. Two nonmodel factors could be found using the model factors, and the factors were classified into direct (P<.05) and indirect (P≥.05), according to the statistical significance of the association with depression. Perceived stress and asthma were the most remarkable risk factors, and urine specific gravity was a novel protective factor. The depression-factor network showed clusters of socioeconomic status and quality of life factors and suggested that educational level and sex might be predisposing factors. Indirect factors (eg, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) were involved in confounding or interaction effects of direct factors. Triglyceride level was a confounder of hypercholesterolemia and diabetes, smoking had a significant risk in females, and weight gain was associated with depression involving diabetes.
conclusionsXGBoost and network analysis were useful to discover depression-related factors and their relationships and can be applied to epidemiological studies using big survey data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.