Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184757›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2021

Ivermectin treatment in humans for reducing malaria transmission.

Dziedzom K de Souza, Rebecca Thomas, John Bradley, Clemence Leyrat, Daniel A Boakye, Joseph Okebe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mass drug administration for malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Ivermectin treatment in humans for reducing malaria transmission.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dziedzom K de Souza *Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Rebecca Thomas *Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
John BradleyMRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Clemence LeyratMedical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Daniel A BoakyeNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Joseph OkebeDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research · GH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/T032448/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is transmitted through the bite of Plasmodium-infected adult female Anopheles mosquitoes. Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug, acts by killing mosquitoes that are exposed to the drug while feeding on the blood of people (known as blood feeds) who have ingested the drug. This effect on mosquitoes has been demonstrated by individual randomized trials. This effect has generated interest in using ivermectin as a tool for malaria control.

objectivesTo assess the effect of community administration of ivermectin on malaria transmission. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group (CIDG) Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation index - expanded, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePORTER database to 14 January 2021. We checked the reference lists of included studies for other potentially relevant studies, and contacted researchers working in the field for unpublished and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs) that compared ivermectin, as single or multiple doses, with a control treatment or placebo given to populations living in malaria-endemic areas, in the context of mass drug administration. Primary outcomes were prevalence of malaria parasite infection and incidence of clinical malaria in the community. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data on the number of events and the number of participants in each trial arm at the time of assessment. For rate data, we noted the total time at risk in each trial arm. To assess risk of bias, we used Cochrane's RoB 2 tool for cRCTs. We documented the method of data analysis, any adjustments for clustering or other covariates, and recorded the estimate of the intra-cluster correlation (ICC) coefficient. We re-analysed the trial data provided by the trial authors to adjust for cluster effects. We used a Poisson mixed-effect model with small sample size correction, and a cluster-level analysis using the linear weighted model to adequately adjust for clustering.  MAIN

resultsWe included one cRCT and identified six ongoing trials.  The included cRCT examined the incidence of malaria in eight villages in Burkina Faso, randomized to two arms. Both trial arms received a single dose of ivermectin 150 µg/kg to 200 µg/kg, together with a dose of albendazole. The villages in the intervention arm received an additional five doses of ivermectin, once every three weeks. Children were enrolled into an active cohort, in which they were repeatedly screened for malaria infection.  The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of uncomplicated malaria in a cohort of children aged five years and younger, over the 18-week study. We judged the study to be at high risk of bias, as the analysis did not account for clustering or correlation between participants in the same village. The study did not demonstrate an effect of Ivermectin on the cumulative incidence of uncomplicated malaria in the cohort of children over the 18-week study (risk ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 1.17; P = 0.2607; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe are uncertain whether community administration of ivermectin has an effect on malaria transmission, based on one trial published to date.

Indexed as

Mosquito ControlAnimalsAntiparasitic AgentsBiasBurkina FasoChild, PreschoolData AnalysisHumansIncidenceInfantIvermectinMalariaPilot ProjectsPrevalenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntiparasitic AgentsIvermectin

Identifiers

PMID34184757
PMCPMC8240090
OpenAlexW2890586042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.