Trial reportCancer communications (London, England)2021
Bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin) as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, phase III trial.
Trial report in Cancer communications (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03533127 (A Phase III Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of LY01008 and Bevacizumab Combined With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Treatment of Naïve Subjects With Metastatic or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of LY01008 and Bevacizumab Combined With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Treatment of Naïve Subjects With Metastatic or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Similarity of Biosimilars and Reference Drugs: A Comprehensive Review and New Hope for Public Health in a New Frontier.Current drug research reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Benefit, Price, and Uptake for Cancer Biosimilars vs Reference Drugs in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SCT510 Compared with Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.Advances in therapy · 2024Trial
- Bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin) as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, phase III trial.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2021Trial
- Economic evaluation of three domestic bevacizumab biosimilars and the original bevacizumab for treating nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in china: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2025Article
- Lighting the path against cancer with academic light: Forty years of growth with the Chinese Medical Association-Celebrating the 110th anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Medical Association.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar SIBP04 compared with bevacizumab (Avastin®) as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Article
- Exploring the crosstalk between endothelial cells, immune cells, and immune checkpoints in the tumor microenvironment: new insights and therapeutic implications.Cell death & disease · 2023Review
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of mFOLOFX6 with or without a targeted drug among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: inverse probability of treatment weighting.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Landscape of the clinical development of China innovative anti-lung cancer drugs.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023Review
- Comparison of efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and original bevacizumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2022Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Biosimilar LY01008 Combined With Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Chinese Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab biosimilar or original drug to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
76 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated the preclinical pharmacological and toxicological consistency, and clinical pharmacokinetic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 with reference bevacizumab (Avastin). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LY01008 with Avastin in first-line treatment of Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsStage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients with evaluable lesions, good physical status, and adequate organ functions from 67 centers across China were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive LY01008 or Avastin 15 mg/kg intravenously in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin (combined treatment) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance monotherapy with LY01008 until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 confirmed by independent radiological review committees (IRRC). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03533127).
resultsBetween December 15
conclusionsLY01008 demonstrated similarity to Avastin in terms of efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC. LY01008 combined with paclitaxel/carboplatin is expected to become a new treatment option for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC patients in the first-line setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.