Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184324›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Estimation and removal of spurious echo artifacts in single-voxel MRS using sensitivity encoding.

Adam Berrington, Michal Považan, Peter B Barker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying out-of-voxel echoes in edited MRS with phase cycle inversion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying the source of spurious signals caused by BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam BerringtonRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-8193
Michal PovažanRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5498-5162
Peter B BarkerRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6410-7793
Kennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MORI, SUSUMU · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn localized MRS, spurious echo artifacts commonly occur when unsuppressed signal outside the volume of interest is excited and refocused. In the spectral domain, these signals often overlap with metabolite resonances and hinder accurate quantification. Because the artifacts originate from regions separate from the target MRS voxel, this work proposes that sensitivity encoding based on receive-coil sensitivity profiles may be used to separate these signal contributions.

methodsNumerical simulations were performed to explore the effect of sensitivity-encoded separation for unknown artifact regions. An imaging-based approach was developed to identify regions that may contribute to spurious echo artifacts, and tested for sensitivity-based unfolding of signal on six data sets from three brain regions. Spectral data reconstructed using the proposed method ("ERASE") were compared with the standard coil combination.

resultsThe method was able to fully unfold artifact signals if regions were known a priori. Mismatch between estimated and true artifact regions reduced the efficiency of removal, yet metabolite signals were unaffected. Water suppression imaging was able to identify regions of unsuppressed signal, and ERASE (from up to eight regions) led to visible removal of artifacts relative to standard reconstruction. Fitting errors across major metabolites were also lower; for example, Cramér-Rao lower bounds of myo-inositol were 13.7% versus 17.5% for ERASE versus standard reconstruction, respectively.

conclusionThe ERASE reconstruction tool was demonstrated to reduce spurious echo artifacts in single-voxel MRS. This tool may be incorporated into standard workflows to improve spectral quality when hardware limitations or other factors result in out-of-voxel signal contamination.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainWaterWaterartifact removalMRSsensitivity encoding

Identifiers

PMID34184324
PMCPMC8530843
OpenAlexW3174708034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.