Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184295›Full record

Trial reportClinical cardiology2021

Effect of melatonin supplementation on endothelial function in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.

Shervin Ghaffari Hoseini, Kiyan Heshmat-Ghahdarijani, Saeid Khosrawi, Mohammad Garakyaraghi, Davood Shafie, Hamidreza Roohafza, Marjan Mansourian, Elham Azizi, Yousof Gheisari, Masoumeh Sadeghi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. New Perspectives on the Role and Therapeutic Potential of Melatonin in Cardiovascular Diseases.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Evidence for the Benefits of Melatonin in Cardiovascular Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shervin Ghaffari HoseiniIsfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-8949
Kiyan Heshmat-GhahdarijaniHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Saeid KhosrawiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad GarakyaraghiHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Davood ShafieHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7999-2393
Hamidreza RoohafzaCardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Marjan MansourianIsfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Elham AziziCardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Yousof GheisariRegenerative Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Masoumeh SadeghiCardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

National Institute for Medical Research Development 397180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the effect of melatonin supplementation on endothelial function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

methodsThis is an analysis of the MeHR trial, a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms of 1:1. Oral 10 mg melatonin tablets or placebo was administered for 24 weeks. Deference in the percentage of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) after the intervention was the primary outcome.

resultsNinety-two patients were included in the study (age: 62.7±10.3 years, 87.0% male, ejection fraction (EF): 28.6±8.1). After adjustment for baseline FMD and age, a statistically significant difference in post-treatment FMD in favor of the melatonin group was seen (estimated marginal means [95%CI], melatonin: 7.84% [6.69-8.98], placebo: 5.98% [4.84-7.12], p = .027). There was no significant difference in the mean of post-treatment systolic/diastolic blood pressure, serum total antioxidant capacity, and serum malondialdehyde (MDA) between groups. Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in FMD and MDA in the melatonin group in nondiabetic patients, while no difference was seen between study groups in diabetic patients.

conclusionsMelatonin supplementation in HFrEF might improve endothelial function; however, this beneficial effect might not be seen in diabetic patients.

Indexed as

Heart FailureMelatoninDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeMelatoninblood pressureendothelial dysfunctionheart failure with reduced ejection fractionmelatoninoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID34184295
PMCPMC8427988
OpenAlexW3173221931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.