Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184267›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2021

Nonadaptive molecular evolution of seminal fluid proteins in Drosophila.

Bahar Patlar, Vivek Jayaswal, José M Ranz, Alberto Civetta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Correlated Gene Copy Number Changes in a Seminal Fluid Protein Network inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Molecular evolution of octopamine receptors inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Gene age shapes functional and evolutionary properties of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An orphan gene is essential for efficient sperm entry into eggs inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Regional specialization, polyploidy, and seminal fluid transcripts in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bahar PatlarDepartment of Biology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada.
Vivek JayaswalSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
José M RanzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, 92697.ORCID 0000-0003-3585-3129
Alberto CivettaDepartment of Biology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, R3B 2E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-5621
University of Winnipeg · CAThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) are a group of reproductive proteins that are among the most evolutionarily divergent known. As SFPs can impact male and female fitness, these proteins have been proposed to evolve under postcopulatory sexual selection (PCSS). However, the fast change of the SFPs can also result from nonadaptive evolution, and the extent to which selective constraints prevent SFPs rapid evolution remains unknown. Using intra- and interspecific sequence information, along with genomics and functional data, we examine the molecular evolution of approximately 300 SFPs in Drosophila. We found that 50-57% of the SFP genes, depending on the population examined, are evolving under relaxed selection. Only 7-12% showed evidence of positive selection, with no evidence supporting other forms of PCSS, and 35-37% of the SFP genes were selectively constrained. Further, despite associations of positive selection with gene location on the X chromosome and protease activity, the analysis of additional genomic and functional features revealed their lack of influence on SFPs evolving under positive selection. Our results highlight a lack of sufficient evidence to claim that most SFPs are driven to evolve rapidly by PCSS while identifying genomic and functional attributes that influence different modes of SFPs evolution.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleMaleReproductionSeminal Plasma ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsSeminal Plasma ProteinsFunctional attributesnonadaptive evolutionpostcopulatory sexual selectionrelaxed selectionselective constraintsseminal fluid proteins

Identifiers

PMID34184267
PMCPMC8457112
OpenAlexW3175068159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.