Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184207›Full record

Observational studyIrish journal of medical science2022

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hip fractures: the central London experience COVID-related urgent geriatric hip trauma (COUGH) study COVERT ( COVid Emergency-Related Trauma and orthopaedics) collaborative.

Chang Park, Kapil Sugand, Arash Aframian, Catrin Morgan, Nadia Pakroo, Charles Gibbons, Michael Fertleman, Dinesh Nathwani, Rajarshi Bhattacharya, Khaled M Sarraf

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Irish journal of medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang ParkImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kapil SugandImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. ks704@ic.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3185-954X
Arash AframianChelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Catrin MorganChelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nadia PakrooChelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Charles GibbonsChelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael FertlemanImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Dinesh NathwaniImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Rajarshi BhattacharyaImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Khaled M SarrafImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOVID-19 has been recognized as the unprecedented global health crisis in modern times. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on treatment of neck of femur fractures (NOFF) against the current guidelines and meeting best practice key performance indicators (KPIs) according to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) in two large central London hospitals. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multi-center, longitudinal, retrospective, observational study of NOFF patients was performed for the first 'golden' month following the lockdown measures introduced in mid-March 2020. This was compared to the same time period in 2019.

resultsA total of 78 cases were observed. NOFFs accounted for 11% more of all acute referrals during the COVID era. There were fewer overall breaches in KPIs in time to theatre in 2020 and also for those awaiting an orthogeriatric review. Time to discharge from the trust during the pandemic was improved by 54% (p < 0.00001) but patients were 51% less likely to return to their usual residence (p = 0.007). The odds ratio was significantly higher for consultant surgeon-led operations and consultant orthogeriatric-led review in the post-COVID era. There was no significant difference in using aerosol-generating anaesthetic procedures or immortality rates between both years.

conclusionThe impact of COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected the KPIs for the treatment of NOFF patients with significant improvement in numerous care domains. These findings may represent the efforts to ensure that these vulnerable patients are treated promptly to minimize their risks from the coronavirus.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hip FracturesOrthopedicsAgedCommunicable Disease ControlCoughHumansLondonPandemicsRetrospective StudiesBest practice tariffCOVID-19EpidemiologyHip fractureMortalityNational hip fracture databaseNeck of femur fractureSurgery

Identifiers

PMID34184207
PMCPMC8238478
OpenAlexW3175912808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.