Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184060›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2021

Impact evaluation of a maternal and neonatal health training intervention in private Ugandan facilities.

Joy Noel Baumgartner, Jennifer Headley, Julius Kirya, Josh Guenther, James Kaggwa, Min Kyung Kim, Luke Aldridge, Stefanie Weiland, Joseph Egger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Strategy for Reducing Maternal Mortality in Rural Kenya.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joy Noel BaumgartnerSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina, 325 Pittsboro Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3550, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1783-8972
Jennifer HeadleyDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Julius KiryaLifeNet International, 64-25 Ring Road, Muyenga PO Box 21189, Kampala, Uganda.
Josh GuentherLifeNet International, 64-25 Ring Road, Muyenga PO Box 21189, Kampala, Uganda.
James KaggwaLifeNet International, 64-25 Ring Road, Muyenga PO Box 21189, Kampala, Uganda.
Min Kyung KimHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Luke AldridgeJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Stefanie WeilandAmerican Leprosy Missions, Greenville, SC 29601, USA.
Joseph EggerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, 310 Trent Dr, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University · USAmerican Leprosy Missions · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mental Health Services and Systems Training ProgramT32MH109436 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Eisenberg, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
LifeNet InternationalNIMH NIH HHS T32 MH109436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global and country-specific targets for reductions in maternal and neonatal mortality in low-resource settings will not be achieved without improvements in the quality of care for optimal facility-based obstetric and newborn care. This global call includes the private sector, which is increasingly serving low-resource pregnant women. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the impact of a clinical and management-training programme delivered by a non-governmental organization [LifeNet International] that partners with clinics on adherence to global standards of clinical quality during labour and delivery in rural Uganda. The secondary aim included describing the effect of the LifeNet training on pre-discharge neonatal and maternal mortality. The LifeNet programme delivered maternal and neonatal clinical trainings over a 10-month period in 2017-18. Direct clinical observations of obstetric deliveries were conducted at baseline (n = 263 pre-intervention) and endline (n = 321 post-intervention) for six faith-based, not-for-profit primary healthcare facilities in the greater Masaka area of Uganda. Direct observation comprised the entire delivery process, from initial client assessment to discharge, and included emergency management (e.g. postpartum haemorrhage and neonatal resuscitation). Data were supplemented by daily facility-based assessments of infrastructure during the study periods. Results showed positive and clinically meaningful increases in observed handwashing, observed delayed cord clamping, partograph use documentation and observed 1- and/or 5-minute APGAR assessments (rapid scoring system for assessing clinical status of newborn), in particular, between baseline and endline. High-quality intrapartum facility-based care is critical for reducing maternal and early neonatal mortality, and this evaluation of the LifeNet intervention indicates that their clinical training programme improved the practice of quality maternal and neonatal healthcare at all six primary care clinics in Uganda, at least over a relatively short-term period. However, for several of these quality indicators, the adherence rates, although improved, were still far from 100% and could benefit from further improvement via refresher trainings and/or a closer examination of the barriers to adherence.

Indexed as

Infant HealthResuscitationFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityPregnancyUgandaclinical adherencematernal healthneonatal healthprivate sectorquality of care

Identifiers

PMID34184060
PMCPMC8359744
OpenAlexW3176082157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.