Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34183788›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021

Can you hear us now? The impact of health-care utilization by rare disease patients in the United States.

Angela A Navarrete-Opazo, Maharaj Singh, Ainslie Tisdale, Christine M Cutillo, Sheldon R Garrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Equity-focused implementation to enhance access to rare disease genomic research and understand diverse perspectives.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela A Navarrete-OpazoAdvocate Aurora Health, Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Maharaj SinghAdvocate Aurora Health, Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ainslie TisdaleNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christine M CutilloNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sheldon R GarrisonAdvocate Aurora Health, Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Milwaukee, WI, USA. sheldon.garrison@aah.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe vast majority of rare diseases (RDs) are complex, disabling, and life-threatening conditions with a genetic origin. RD patients face significant health challenges and limited treatments, yet the extent of their impact within health care is not well known. One direct method to gauge the disease burden of RDs is their overall cost and utilization within health-care systems.

methodsThe 2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) databases were used to extract health-care utilization data using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes.

resultsOf 35.6 million national hospital weighted discharges in the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 32% corresponded to RD-associated ICD-10 codes. Total charges were nearly equal between RDs ($768 billion) compared to common conditions (CCs) ($880 billion) (p < 0.0001). These charges were a result of higher charges per discharge and longer length of stay (LOS) for RD patients compared to those with CCs (p < 0.0001). Health-care cost and utilization was similarly higher for RDs with pediatric inpatient stays, readmissions, and emergency visits.

conclusionPediatric and adult discharges with RDs show substantially higher health-care utilization compared to discharges with CCs diagnoses, accounting for nearly half of the US national bill.

Indexed as

HospitalizationRare DiseasesAdultChildHealth Care CostsHumansLength of StayPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34183788
PMCPMC8553605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.