ArticleBone marrow transplantation2021
Prognostic values of D816V KIT mutation and peri-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring on acute myeloid leukemia with CBFB-MYH11.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi omics and mechanistic investigation reveals CBFB as a prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Identifying myosin heavy chain 11 as a predictive biomarker of prostate cancer progression and antiandrogen resistance.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Multi-omics integration of molecular genetics, cytogenetics and immunophenotyping: a novel prognostic model for immune landscape characterization and outcome prediction in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The consensus from The Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the controversies in the prognostic value of KIT mutations and optimal thresholds and time points of MRD monitoring for AML with CBFB-MYH11, we retrospectively evaluated 88 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT, n = 60) or autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT, n = 28). The D816V KIT mutation was significantly associated with post-transplant relapse, contrasting with other types of mutations in KIT. Pre- and post-transplant (3 months after transplant) CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were useful in predicting post-transplant relapse and poor survival. The optimal threshold was determined as a 2 log reduction at both time points. In multivariate analysis, the D816V KIT mutation and CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were independently associated with post-transplant relapse and survival. Stratification by D816V KIT and pre-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD status further distinguished the risk of relapse and survival. Auto-HSCT was superior to Allo-HSCT in MRD negative patients without D816V KIT, while Allo-HSCT trended to be superior to Auto-HSCT in patients with MRD positivity or the D816V KIT mutation. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the differentiated prognostic value of the D816V KIT mutation in AML with CBFB-MYH11 and clarified optimal time points and thresholds for CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring in the setting of HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.