Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34183742›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Specificity of eccentric hamstring training and the lack of consistency between strength assessments using conventional test devices.

Hans-Peter Wiesinger, Manuel Scharinger, Alexander Kösters, Christoph Gressenbauer, Erich Müller

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans-Peter WiesingerDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Schlossalle 49, 5400, Hallein/Rif, Salzburg, Austria. hans-peter.wiesinger@sbg.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-8526-2832
Manuel ScharingerDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Schlossalle 49, 5400, Hallein/Rif, Salzburg, Austria.
Alexander KöstersDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Schlossalle 49, 5400, Hallein/Rif, Salzburg, Austria.
Christoph GressenbauerDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Schlossalle 49, 5400, Hallein/Rif, Salzburg, Austria.
Erich MüllerDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Schlossalle 49, 5400, Hallein/Rif, Salzburg, Austria.
University of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hamstring injuries are endemic, but influences of test-specific training and the application of different test methods on decision making remain elusive. Sport-students were randomised to isokinetic (IG) or Nordic hamstring (NG) exercise or a control group (CG) for six weeks. Training and testing procedures were matched to biomechanical parameters. Hamstring strength (EPT), work, muscle soreness (visual analogue scale (VAS)), biceps femoris (BF

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultExerciseHamstring MusclesHumansKneeLegMaleMuscle StrengthMyalgiaResistance TrainingSports

Identifiers

PMID34183742
PMCPMC8239011
OpenAlexW3174813440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.