Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34183684›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Automated segmentation of macular edema for the diagnosis of ocular disease using deep learning method.

Zhenhua Wang, Yuanfu Zhong, Mudi Yao, Yan Ma, Wenping Zhang, Chaopeng Li, Zhifu Tao, Qin Jiang, Biao Yan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenhua Wang *College of Information Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.
Yuanfu Zhong *College of Information Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.
Mudi Yao *The Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 200025, China.
Yan Ma *The Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 200025, China.
Wenping ZhangCollege of Information Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306, China.
Chaopeng LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Huai'an City, Huai'an, 223001, China.
Zhifu TaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Firstirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Qin JiangThe Affiliated Eye Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 200025, China. jiangqin710@126.com.
Biao YanEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 83# Fen Yang Road, Shanghai, 200030, China. yanbiao1982@hotmail.com.
Nanjing Medical University · CNShanghai Ocean University · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNHuaian First People’s Hospital · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macular edema is considered as a major cause of visual loss and blindness in patients with ocular fundus diseases. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique, which has been widely applied for diagnosing macular edema due to its non-invasive and high resolution properties. However, the practical applications remain challenges due to the distorted retinal morphology and blurred boundaries near macular edema. Herein, we developed a novel deep learning model for the segmentation of macular edema in OCT images based on DeepLab framework (OCT-DeepLab). In this model, we used atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) to detect macular edema at multiple features and used the fully connected conditional random field (CRF) to refine the boundary of macular edema. OCT-DeepLab model was compared against the traditional hand-crafted methods (C-V and SBG) and the end-to-end methods (FCN, PSPnet, and U-net) to estimate the segmentation performance. OCT-DeepLab showed great advantage over the hand-crafted methods (C-V and SBG) and end-to-end methods (FCN, PSPnet, and U-net) as shown by higher precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. The segmentation performance of OCT-DeepLab was comparable to that of manual label, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963, which was superior to other end-to-end methods (FCN, PSPnet, and U-net). Collectively, OCT-DeepLab model is suitable for the segmentation of macular edema and assist ophthalmologists in the management of ocular disease.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMacular EdemaNeural Networks, ComputerRetinaTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID34183684
PMCPMC8238965
OpenAlexW3175077653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.