ArticleScientific data2021
Triton, a new species-level database of Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal occurrences.
Article in Scientific data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex marine ecological response during the Eocene-Oligocene revealed by global foraminiferal record.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The billion-dollar case for sustaining palaeontology's digital databases.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Regional restructuring in planktic foraminifera communities through Pliocene-early Pleistocene climate variability.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Record of Foraminifera test composition throughout the Phanerozoic.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Museum 'dark data' show variable impacts on deep-time biogeographic and evolutionary history.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The Metapopulation Bridge to Macroevolutionary Speciation Rates: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Test.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- The Micropaleoecology Framework: Evaluating Biotic Responses to Global Change Through Paleoproxy, Microfossil, and Ecological Data Integration.Ecology and evolution · 2024Review
- Trait-mediated speciation and human-driven extinctions in proboscideans revealed by unsupervised Bayesian neural networks.Science advances · 2024Article
- Article
- ForCenS-LGM: a dataset of planktonic foraminifera species assemblage composition for the Last Glacial Maximum.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Conceptual and empirical bridges between micro- and macroevolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Review
- The FORCIS database: A global census of planktonic Foraminifera from ocean waters.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Plankton response to global warming is characterized by non-uniform shifts in assemblage composition since the last ice age.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Planktonic foraminifera are a major constituent of ocean floor sediments, and thus have one of the most complete fossil records of any organism. Expeditions to sample these sediments have produced large amounts of spatiotemporal occurrence records throughout the Cenozoic, but no single source exists to house these data. We have therefore created a comprehensive dataset that integrates numerous sources for spatiotemporal records of planktonic foraminifera. This new dataset, Triton, contains >500,000 records and is four times larger than the previous largest database, Neptune. To ensure comparability among data sources, we have cleaned all records using a unified set of taxonomic concepts and have converted age data to the GTS 2020 timescale. Where ages were not absolute (e.g. based on biostratigraphic or magnetostratigraphic zones), we have used generalised additive models to produce continuous estimates. This dataset is an excellent resource for macroecological and macroevolutionary studies, particularly for investigating how species responded to past climatic changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.