ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021
Deep proteogenomic investigations elucidate the NRF2 antioxidant mechanism as a major driving mechanism of lung adenocarcinoma in Asia.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multiomic investigation of lung adenocarcinoma molecular subtypes.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024Article
- State-of-the-Art Molecular Oncology of Lung Cancer in Taiwan.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Prognostic prediction and gene regulation network ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung adenocarcinoma is a global leading cause of death. Despite modern therapeutic interventions, undesirable outcomes such as drug resistances and disease recurrence still occur. Therefore, continued investigations of disease driving mechanisms and counteracting strategies are urgently needed.
methodsWe re-visited two deep-proteogenomic resources of lung adenocarcinoma published recently. These resources were derived from patient cohorts with decent sizes in Taiwan and China. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed. A heatmap was produced by the generalized association plot (GAP).
resultsAmong 189 common oncogenic pathways investigated, the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) downstream antioxidant mechanism was uncovered for the first time the leading oncogenic mechanism of lung adenocarcinoma in Taiwan. The gene levels of NRF2 (also known as NFE2L2) is negatively correlated with those of KEAP1 (Pearson's correlation = -0.275, p = 0.009) in patients' tumor tissues. Furthermore, the protein levels of EIF2S2 and PGD are higher in patients with more advanced stages in the Taiwan cohort (p = 0.001 and 0.05, respectively), and are indicative of poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the China cohort (all Cox-regression p < 0.05). On the other hand, EPHX1 is higher in patients with earlier stages in Taiwan (p = 0.003), and are indicative of better PFS and OS in China (both Cox-regression p < 0.05). When the patients were stratified using the median protein abundances for Kaplan-Meier visualizations, patient strata with higher EIF2S2, PGD, and EPHX1 have significantly poorer PFS (log-rank p = 0.041); poorer OS (p = 0.006), and better PFS and OS (p = 0.001 and 0.030), respectively.
conclusionThe NRF2 downstream antioxidant mechanism is one major driving mechanism of lung adenocarcinoma in Asia, and represents important directions for future therapeutic interventions. Major downstream proteins such as EIF2S2, PGD, and EPHX1 are indicative of cancer stages and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.