Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34183334›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a secondary analysis using published data.

Miriam Casey-Bryars, John Griffin, Conor McAloon, Andrew Byrne, Jamie Madden, David Mc Evoy, Áine Collins, Kevin Hunt, Ann Barber, Francis Butler and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Shorter Incubation Period among Unvaccinated Delta Variant Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Miriam Casey-BryarsCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland miriam.casey@ucd.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-9057-2779
John GriffinCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7509-6770
Conor McAloonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, UCD School of Agriculture Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-4031
Andrew ByrneOne Health Scientific Support Unit, Government of Ireland Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4586
Jamie MaddenCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
David Mc EvoySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8230-8727
Áine CollinsCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Kevin HuntCentre for Food Safety, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ann BarberCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Francis ButlerCentre for Food Safety, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Elizabeth Ann LaneCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6311-8335
Kirsty O'BrienHealth Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland.
Patrick WallPublic Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Kieran WalshHealth Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland.
Simon John MoreCentre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-0385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the proportion of presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection that can occur, and the timing of transmission relative to symptom onset. SETTING/

designSecondary analysis of international published data. DATA SOURCES: Meta-analysis of COVID-19 incubation period and a rapid review of serial interval and generation time, which are published separately.

participantsData from China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Italy, Republic of Korea, Singapore and Vietnam from December 2019 to May 2020.

methodsSimulations were generated of incubation period and of serial interval or generation time. From these, transmission times relative to symptom onset, and the proportion of presymptomatic transmission, were estimated. OUTCOME MEASURES: Transmission time of SARS-CoV-2 relative to symptom onset and proportion of presymptomatic transmission.

resultsBased on 18 serial interval/generation time estimates from 15 papers, mean transmission time relative to symptom onset ranged from -2.6 (95% CI -3.0 to -2.1) days before infector symptom onset to 1.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.8) days after symptom onset. The proportion of presymptomatic transmission ranged from 45.9% (95% CI 42.9% to 49.0%) to 69.1% (95% CI 66.2% to 71.9%).

conclusionsThere is substantial potential for presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 across a range of different contexts. This highlights the need for rapid case detection, contact tracing and quarantine. The transmission patterns that we report reflect the combination of biological infectiousness and transmission opportunities which vary according to context.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2ChinaContact TracingHumansIranItalyRepublic of KoreaSingaporeVietnamepidemiologyinfection controlinfectious diseasespublic healthvirology

Identifiers

PMID34183334
PMCPMC8245290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.