ArticleBiomedical journal2021
Aggressive cytoreduction and multiple subpial cortical transections may obtain good surgical outcomes in refractory epilepsy with multiple epileptic foci.
Article in Biomedical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- This is not a pipe - But how harmful is electronic cigarette smoke.Biomedical journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsEpilepsy surgery is the most efficacious therapeutic modality for patients with medical refractory epilepsy, especially resective surgery. However, the variable etiologies and multiple epileptic foci are usually associated with the outcomes. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that combination of different intervention procedures might be an alternative option for patients of refractory epilepsy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed pre-operative and post-surgical outcomes in 30 patients who received epilepsy surgery between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), Linkou, according to Engel's classification.
resultsTwenty-six of the 30 patients (86.7%) had good outcomes, sum of class I and class II after epilepsy surgery. The good outcome rate of our complicated group was 80.0% (12/15), compared to 93.3% (14/15) in the simple group, but no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.569). Four patients whose epileptic foci involved eloquent area and received multiple subpial cortical transection, and good outcome rate was 75% (3/4). At last, six patients had previously failed epilepsy surgery and received a reoperation, with a good outcome rate of 83.3% (5/6).
conclusionAfter complete pre-surgical evaluation and combined interventional procedures, the patients with refractory epilepsy had satisfactory outcomes and few neurological complications. Moreover, re-operation can improve the outcome in some patients who previously failed epilepsy surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.