Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34183047›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

ORFograph: search for novel insecticidal protein genes in genomic and metagenomic assembly graphs.

Tatiana Dvorkina, Anton Bankevich, Alexei Sorokin, Fan Yang, Boahemaa Adu-Oppong, Ryan Williams, Keith Turner, Pavel A Pevzner

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Tatiana DvorkinaCenter for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anton BankevichDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alexei SorokinUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, Micalis Institute, AgroParisTech, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Fan YangData Science & Analytics, Bayer U.S. - Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Boahemaa Adu-OppongData Science & Analytics, Bayer U.S. - Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Ryan WilliamsData Science & Analytics, Bayer U.S. - Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Keith TurnerData Science & Analytics, Bayer U.S. - Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
Pavel A PevznerDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. ppevzner@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-165X
Profectus Biosciences (United States) · USPrometheus Biosciences (United States) · USSt Petersburg University · RUThermo Fisher Scientific (United States) · USUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

Russian Science Foundation grant 19-14-00172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the prolonged use of insecticidal proteins has led to toxin resistance, it is important to search for novel insecticidal protein genes (IPGs) that are effective in controlling resistant insect populations. IPGs are usually encoded in the genomes of entomopathogenic bacteria, especially in large plasmids in strains of the ubiquitous soil bacteria, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). Since there are often multiple similar IPGs encoded by such plasmids, their assemblies are typically fragmented and many IPGs are scattered through multiple contigs. As a result, existing gene prediction tools (that analyze individual contigs) typically predict partial rather than complete IPGs, making it difficult to conduct downstream IPG engineering efforts in agricultural genomics.

methodsAlthough it is difficult to assemble IPGs in a single contig, the structure of the genome assembly graph often provides clues on how to combine multiple contigs into segments encoding a single IPG.

resultsWe describe ORFograph, a pipeline for predicting IPGs in assembly graphs, benchmark it on (meta)genomic datasets, and discover nearly a hundred novel IPGs. This work shows that graph-aware gene prediction tools enable the discovery of greater diversity of IPGs from (meta)genomes.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that analysis of the assembly graphs reveals novel candidate IPGs. ORFograph identified both already known genes "hidden" in assembly graphs and potential novel IPGs that evaded existing tools for IPG identification. As ORFograph is fast, one could imagine a pipeline that processes many (meta)genomic assembly graphs to identify even more novel IPGs for phenotypic testing than would previously be inaccessible by traditional gene-finding methods. While here we demonstrated the results of ORFograph only for IPGs, the proposed approach can be generalized to any class of genes. Video abstract.

Indexed as

InsecticidesAlgorithmsGenomicsMetagenomeMetagenomicsInsecticidesBacterial genomicsBioinformaticsBioinsecticidesGene findingMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID34183047
PMCPMC8240309
OpenAlexW3173770219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.