Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34182977›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Diabetes self-management in online health communities: an information exchange perspective.

Jing Min, Yan Chen, Li Wang, Ting He, Sha Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing MinDepartment of Endocrinology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, No. 26, Shengli Street, Jiang'an District, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei Province, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, No. 26, Shengli Street, Jiang'an District, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei Province, China. 29817231@qq.com.
Li WangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, No. 26, Shengli Street, Jiang'an District, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei Province, China.
Ting HeDepartment of Endocrinology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, No. 26, Shengli Street, Jiang'an District, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei Province, China.
Sha TangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, No. 26, Shengli Street, Jiang'an District, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei Province, China.
Central Hospital of Wuhan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline health communities (OHCs), with a wealth of multi-source information exchange, have provided a convenient way for people with diabetes to actively participate in their self-management and have been widely used. Information exchange assists people with diabetes with health-related decisions to actively engage in their care, and reduce the occurrence of potential complications of diabetes. However, there has been relatively little research on the information exchange behaviors and their effect on health in professional online medical platforms-OHCs.

objectiveUsing a social exchange theory, this study focuses on two sources of information (doctors and people with diabetes) to investigate information exchange behaviors and consequences. Moreover, we also examine moderating effects of information price as patients need to pay prices for consulting with doctors to obtain medical information on OHCs.

methodsBy using the Python program, a rich dataset contained 22,746 doctor-patient dialogues from December 2017 to December 2018 is collected from the biggest OHC in China. Then the logistic and ordinal regression models are used to get empirical results.

resultsWe found that first information sharing from doctors and other people with diabetes can promote their information sharing behavior. Second, the moderating effects of information price are heterogeneous and change with the exchange participants. Third, rich information exchange supports self-management of people with diabetes and improves their health status.

conclusionThis study is among the first that tests the information exchange behavior and consequence for diabetes in OHCs and examines the moderating effects of the information price. The present study produces several insights, which have implications for social exchange, patient behavior, online health communities, and information technology in diabetes self-management literature.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPhysiciansSelf-ManagementTelemedicineChinaHumansInternetPhysician-Patient RelationseHealthHealth care costsHealth Information ExchangeSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID34182977
PMCPMC8240193
OpenAlexW3175432064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.