Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34182898›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2021

A guide to cranial nerve testing for musculoskeletal clinicians.

Alan Taylor, Firas Mourad, Roger Kerry, Nathan Hutting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Understanding degenerative cervical myelopathy in musculoskeletal practice.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan TaylorFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, University of Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-0057
Firas MouradFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Clinical Science and Translation Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8981-2085
Roger KerryFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, University of Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7751-4953
Nathan HuttingDepartment of Occupation and Health, School of Organisation and Development, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6164-6265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurological examination in musculoskeletal practice is a key element of safe and appropriate orthopedic clinical practice. With physiotherapists currently positioning themselves as advanced first line practitioners, it is essential that those who treat patients who present with neck/head/orofacial pain and associated symptoms, should have an index of suspicion of cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction. They should be able to examine and determine if CN dysfunction is present, and make appropriate clinical decisions based upon those findings.

methodsThis paper summarizes the functions, potential impairments of the nerves, associated conditions, and basic skills involved in cranial nerve examination.

resultsA summary of cranial nerve examination is provided, which is based on the function of the nerves, This is intended to facilitate clinicians to feel more confident at understanding neural function/impairment, as well as performing and interpreting the examination.

conclusionThis paper illustrates that CN testing can be performed quickly, efficiently and without the need for complicated or potentially unavailable equipment. An understanding of the CN's function and potential reasons for impairment is likely to increase the frequency of CN testing in orthopedic clinical practice and referral if positive findings are encountered.

Indexed as

Cranial NervesHumansCranial nervesexaminationimpairmentmusculoskeletal practice

Identifiers

PMID34182898
PMCPMC8725776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.