Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34182597›Full record

ArticleCancer2021

Outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia with or without venetoclax-based therapy.

Sangeetha Venugopal, Mahran Shoukier, Marina Konopleva, Courtney D Dinardo, Farhad Ravandi, Nicholas J Short, Michael Andreeff, Gautam Borthakur, Naval Daver, Naveen Pemmaraju and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Magrolimab in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Phase Ib/II Study and Correlative Analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Patients withCancers · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sangeetha VenugopalDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-6415
Mahran ShoukierDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Courtney D DinardoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Nicholas J ShortDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-2738
Michael AndreeffDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Naval DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7103-373X
Naveen PemmarajuDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1670-6513
Koji SasakiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9140-0610
Guillermo Montalban-BravoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-5176
Kayleigh R MarxDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9468-9707
Sherry PierceDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Uday R PopatDepartment of Stem Cell Transplant, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7592-2224
Elizabeth J ShpallDepartment of Stem Cell Transplant, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rashmi Kanagal-ShamannaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7829-5249
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-2482
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9832
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has become the standard of care for patients aged >75 years and for those not eligible for intensive chemotherapy who have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The benefit of VEN-based therapy in patients who have newly diagnosed AML with mutations in the TP53 gene (TP53

methodsIn this single-institutional, retrospective analysis, the authors assessed the clinical outcomes of 238 patients with newly diagnosed TP53

resultsPatients who received VEN-based regimens were older (aged >65 years: 81% vs 65%; P = .02) and had higher response rates (complete remission, 43% vs 32%; P = .06) than those who received non-VEN-based regimens. Compared with patients who received non-VEN-based regimens, no difference in overall survival (median, 6.6 vs 5.7 months; P = .4) or relapse-free survival (median, 4.7 vs 3.5 months; P = .43) was observed in those who received VEN-based regimens, regardless of age or intensity of treatment.

conclusionsThe addition of VEN to standard treatment regimens did not improve outcomes in younger or older patients who had TP53

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAgedBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHumansRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesTumor Suppressor Protein p53Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53venetoclaxacute myeloid leukemia (AML)hypomethylating agentTP53venetoclax (VEN)

Identifiers

PMID34182597
PMCPMC12132598
OpenAlexW3175636756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.