ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Development and Accuracy Evaluation of Augmented Reality-based Patient Positioning System in Radiotherapy: A Phantom Study.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-in-human trial using mixed-reality visualization for patient setup during breast or chest wall radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Clinical Application to Improve the "Depth Perception Problem" by Combining Augmented Reality and a 3D Printing Model.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Assessment of the viability of integrating virtual reality programs in practical tests for the Korean Radiological Technologists Licensing Examination: a survey studyJournal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2023Article
- Advances and Innovations in Ablative Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Using Mixed Reality Technologies in Personalized Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Augmented reality-guided positioning system for radiotherapy patients.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Development and feasibility evaluation of an AR-assisted radiotherapy positioning system.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Surgery for Rectal Cancer With Mixed Reality of 3D Model During Operation: A Case Report.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
- Enhancing self-care implementation and reducing marker detachment rates in cancer radiotherapy patients through diverse nursing care strategies.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimTo develop and evaluate the accuracy of augmented reality (AR)-based patient positioning systems in radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsAR head-mounted displays (AR-HMDs), which virtually superimpose a three-dimensional (3D) image generated by the digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data, have been developed. The AR-based positioning feasibility was evaluated. Then, the setup errors of three translational axes directions and rotation angles between the AR and the conventional laser-based positioning were compared.
resultsThe AR-based pelvic phantom positioning was feasible. The setup errors of AR-based positioning were comparable to laser-based positioning in all translational axis directions and rotation angles. The time necessary for AR-based positioning was significantly longer than that for laser-based positioning (171.0 s vs. 47.5 s, p<0.001).
conclusionAR-based positioning for radiotherapy was feasible, and showed comparable positioning errors to those of conventional line-based positioning; however, a markedly longer setup time was necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.