ArticleJournal of environmental management2021
Metagenomic profiling of antibiotic resistance and virulence removal: Activated sludge vs. algal wastewater treatment system.
Article in Journal of environmental management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of non-sterile biogas slurry from a pig farm using microalgae isolated from the activated sludge of sewage plants.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Rethinking the words hostspot reservoir and pristine in the environmental dimensions of antimicrobial resistance.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- Significance and Applications of the Thermo-Acidophilic MicroalgaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional activated sludge-based (CAS) wastewater treatment plants are known to be a source of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and virulence genes (VGs). As an alternative, a single-step mixotrophic algal wastewater treatment (A-WWT) system is proposed here to effectively reduce ARGs and VGs in the final effluent while meeting all the discharge standards. In this study, we applied the metagenomic profiling approach to compare the A-WWT system against the CAS system in terms of removal efficacy of ARG and VGs. A total of 111 ARG and 93 VG subtypes belonging to 10 antibiotic resistant classes and 19 virulence classes were detected in this study. Although the CAS system reduced the relative abundance of most classes of ARGs (7 of 10) and VGs (11 of 19), 3 ARG classes and 7 VG classes had increased abundances. On the other hand, the A-WWT system reduced the relative abundance of all classes of ARGs and VGs, and effectively eliminated most subtypes of ARGs and VGs. In the CAS system, the bacterial genera carrying ARGs and VGs was expanded, and the diversity index was increased greatly, suggesting the occurrence of horizontal gene transfer (HGT). In contrast, the A-WWT system narrowed down the potential host range and decreased their diversity substantially. Results of this study highlight the potential risk of ARGs and VGs in CAS system and demonstrate the feasibility of the algal-based system in removing ARGs and VGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.