ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021
COVID-19 cough classification using machine learning and global smartphone recordings.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Respiratory Diseases Diagnosis Using Audio Analysis and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Combating COVID-19 Crisis using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Approach: Systematic Review.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024Pooled it
- The Use of Audio Signals for Detecting COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Critical Analysis of the Current Medical Image-Based Processing Techniques for Automatic Disease Evaluation: Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Beyond fingerprint and voice print: cough sequence sound for identity verification.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Respiratory Disease Detection: A Systematic Review of AI-Based Approaches, from Audio and Visual Unimodal Methods to Multimodal Integration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Decoding Gender in Cough Sounds: A Transformer-Based Analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Cough Audio Recognition for Early Detection of Respiratory Diseases: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Advanced COVID-19 detection using cough signals with space reconstruction and 3D deep convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ResNet-EfficientNet powered framework for high-precision cough-based classification of infectious diseases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A cross sectional feasibility study to evaluate the usability and efficacy of Swaasa AI platform for rapid respiratory health assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Accelerating Cough-Based Algorithms for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Screening: Results From the CODA TB DREAM Challenge.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Manual Versus Hammer Percussion Frequency-Domain Acoustic Screening for Hip Fracture: A Comparative Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Generative AI and unstructured audio data for precision public health.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Speech-based respiratory diagnostics: A study on COVID-19 detection with machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- SympCoughNet: symptom assisted audio-based COVID-19 detection.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Population Digital Health: Continuous Health Monitoring and Profiling at Scale.Online journal of public health informatics · 2024Article
- Acoustic and Clinical Data Analysis of Vocal Recordings: Pandemic Insights and Lessons.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fused Audio Instance and Representation for Respiratory Disease Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a machine learning based COVID-19 cough classifier which can discriminate COVID-19 positive coughs from both COVID-19 negative and healthy coughs recorded on a smartphone. This type of screening is non-contact, easy to apply, and can reduce the workload in testing centres as well as limit transmission by recommending early self-isolation to those who have a cough suggestive of COVID-19. The datasets used in this study include subjects from all six continents and contain both forced and natural coughs, indicating that the approach is widely applicable. The publicly available Coswara dataset contains 92 COVID-19 positive and 1079 healthy subjects, while the second smaller dataset was collected mostly in South Africa and contains 18 COVID-19 positive and 26 COVID-19 negative subjects who have undergone a SARS-CoV laboratory test. Both datasets indicate that COVID-19 positive coughs are 15%-20% shorter than non-COVID coughs. Dataset skew was addressed by applying the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). A leave-p-out cross-validation scheme was used to train and evaluate seven machine learning classifiers: logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbour (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and a residual-based neural network architecture (Resnet50). Our results show that although all classifiers were able to identify COVID-19 coughs, the best performance was exhibited by the Resnet50 classifier, which was best able to discriminate between the COVID-19 positive and the healthy coughs with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.98. An LSTM classifier was best able to discriminate between the COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative coughs, with an AUC of 0.94 after selecting the best 13 features from a sequential forward selection (SFS). Since this type of cough audio classification is cost-effective and easy to deploy, it is potentially a useful and viable means of non-contact COVID-19 screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.