ReviewNeuroImage2021
Learning to estimate the fiber orientation distribution function from diffusion-weighted MRI.
Review in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microscopy-informed structural connectivity mapping in the in vivo human brain via domain adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Moderating role of executive function in the relationship between specific white matter changes and long-term delayed recall in aMCI patients.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- FORCE: FORward modeling for Complex microstructure Estimation.Research square · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for fODF Estimation in Infant Brains: Model Comparison, Ground-Truth Impact, and Domain Shift Mitigation.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Learning-enhanced 3D fiber orientation mapping in thick cardiac tissues.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Equivariant spherical CNNs for accurate fiber orientation distribution estimation in neonatal diffusion MRI with reduced acquisition time.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Ground-truth effects in learning-based fiber orientation distribution estimation in neonatal brains.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Article
- DIMOND: DIffusion Model OptimizatioN with Deep Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- LEARNING SPATIALLY-CONTINUOUS FIBER ORIENTATION FUNCTIONS.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2024Article
- Light-weight neural network for intra-voxel structure analysis.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Robust fiber orientation distribution function estimation using deep constrained spherical deconvolution for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Computational approaches for the reconstruction of optic nerve fibers along the visual pathway from medical images: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimation of white matter fiber orientation distribution function (fODF) is the essential first step for reliable brain tractography and connectivity analysis. Most of the existing fODF estimation methods rely on sub-optimal physical models of the diffusion signal or mathematical simplifications, which can impact the estimation accuracy. In this paper, we propose a data-driven method that avoids some of these pitfalls. Our proposed method is based on a multilayer perceptron that learns to map the diffusion-weighted measurements, interpolated onto a fixed spherical grid in the q space, to the target fODF. Importantly, we also propose methods for synthesizing reliable simulated training data. We show that the model can be effectively trained with simulated or real training data. Our phantom experiments show that the proposed method results in more accurate fODF estimation and tractography than several competing methods including the multi-tensor model, Bayesian estimation, spherical deconvolution, and two other machine learning techniques. On real data, we compare our method with other techniques in terms of accuracy of estimating the ground-truth fODF. The results show that our method is more accurate than other methods, and that it performs better than the competing methods when applied to under-sampled diffusion measurements. We also compare our method with the Sparse Fascicle Model in terms of expert ratings of the accuracy of reconstruction of several commissural, projection, association, and cerebellar tracts. The results show that the tracts reconstructed with the proposed method are rated significantly higher by three independent experts. Our study demonstrates the potential of data-driven methods for improving the accuracy and robustness of fODF estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.