Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34181880›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2021

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in ChAdOx1-S-primed participants (CombiVacS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

Alberto M Borobia, Antonio J Carcas, Mayte Pérez-Olmeda, Luis Castaño, María Jesús Bertran, Javier García-Pérez, Magdalena Campins, Antonio Portolés, María González-Pérez, María Teresa García Morales and 17 more

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 239 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
239citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
24.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04860739 no registry record found
NCT05205746 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Study to Evaluate Immunogenicity and Safety in Subjects With Evidence of Prior Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 of a Single Intramuscular or Intranasal Dose of the Live Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Based AVX/COVID-12 Vaccine

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratorio Avi-Mex, S.A. de C.V.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled158ConditionsSARS CoV 2 InfectionArmsRecombinant NDV Vectored Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2, Placebo
NCT05668065 phase3completednot on this map

Immunogenicity of Heterologous Versus Homologous Prime Boost Schedule With mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines: a Single-blinded, Randomized, Parallel Group Superiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Pasteur de TunisRan2021 to 2022Enrolled199ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsCoronaVac/CoronaVac, CoronaVac/BNT162b2
NCT05710783 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase II/III Parallel, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Study With Active Control, to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Booster Immunization Scheme With a Single Intramuscular Dose of the Recombinant Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratorio Avi-Mex, S.A. de C.V.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled4,065ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 InfectionArmsAVX-COVID/12, ChAdOx-1-S[recombinant]
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

239 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 385 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

179 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto M BorobiaServicio de Farmacología Clínica, Departamento de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio J CarcasServicio de Farmacología Clínica, Departamento de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Mayte Pérez-OlmedaLaboratorio de Serología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Luis CastañoHospital Universitario de Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia HRI, UPV/EHU, OSAKIDETZA, CIBERDEM, CIBERER, Endo-ERN, Barakaldo-Bilbao, Spain.
María Jesús BertranServicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier García-PérezUnidad de Inmunopatología del SIDA, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Magdalena CampinsServicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Servicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio PortolésServicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Farmacología y Toxicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María González-PérezLaboratorio de Referencia en Inmunología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Teresa García MoralesInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Eunate Arana-ArriHospital Universitario de Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia HRI, UPV/EHU, OSAKIDETZA, CIBERDEM, CIBERER, Endo-ERN, Barakaldo-Bilbao, Spain.
Marta AldeaServicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco Díez-FuertesUnidad de Inmunopatología del SIDA, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada FuentesUnidad de Soporte a la Investigación Clínica, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Servicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana AscasoServicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Farmacología y Toxicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
David LoraInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Natale Imaz-AyoHospital Universitario de Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia HRI, UPV/EHU, OSAKIDETZA, CIBERDEM, CIBERER, Endo-ERN, Barakaldo-Bilbao, Spain.
Lourdes E Barón-MiraServicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonia AgustíDepartmento de Farmacología, Terapéutica y Toxicología, Servicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carla Pérez-IngiduaServicio de Farmacología Clínica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Farmacología y Toxicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín Gómez de la CámaraInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
José Ramón ArribasServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jordi OchandoLaboratorio de Referencia en Inmunología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
José AlcamíUnidad de Inmunopatología del SIDA, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Cristóbal Belda-IniestaCentro Nacional de Microbiología, and Evaluation and Promotion of Research, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: cbelda@isciii.es.
Jesús FríasServicio de Farmacología Clínica, Departamento de Farmacología y Terapéutica, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jesus.frias@uam.es.
CombiVacS Study Group
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESBioCruces Health research Institute · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESCentro Nacional de Microbiologia · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no immunological data on COVID-19 heterologous vaccination schedules in humans have been reported. We assessed the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, BioNTech, Mainz, Germany) administered as second dose in participants primed with ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca, Oxford, UK).

methodsWe did a phase 2, open-label, randomised, controlled trial on adults aged 18-60 years, vaccinated with a single dose of ChAdOx1-S 8-12 weeks before screening, and no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either BNT162b2 (0·3 mL) via a single intramuscular injection (intervention group) or continue observation (control group). The primary outcome was 14-day immunogenicity, measured by immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein and receptor binding domain (RBD). Antibody functionality was assessed using a pseudovirus neutralisation assay, and cellular immune response using an interferon-γ immunoassay. The safety outcome was 7-day reactogenicity, measured as solicited local and systemic adverse events. The primary analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of BNT162b2 and who had at least one efficacy evaluation after baseline. The safety analysis included all participants who received BNT162b2. This study is registered with EudraCT (2021-001978-37) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04860739), and is ongoing.

findingsBetween April 24 and 30, 2021, 676 individuals were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=450) or control group (n=226) at five university hospitals in Spain (mean age 44 years [SD 9]; 382 [57%] women and 294 [43%] men). 663 (98%) participants (n=441 intervention, n=222 control) completed the study up to day 14. In the intervention group, geometric mean titres of RBD antibodies increased from 71·46 BAU/mL (95% CI 59·84-85·33) at baseline to 7756·68 BAU/mL (7371·53-8161·96) at day 14 (p<0·0001). IgG against trimeric spike protein increased from 98·40 BAU/mL (95% CI 85·69-112·99) to 3684·87 BAU/mL (3429·87-3958·83). The interventional:control ratio was 77·69 (95% CI 59·57-101·32) for RBD protein and 36·41 (29·31-45·23) for trimeric spike protein IgG. Reactions were mild (n=1210 [68%]) or moderate (n=530 [30%]), with injection site pain (n=395 [88%]), induration (n=159 [35%]), headache (n=199 [44%]), and myalgia (n=194 [43%]) the most commonly reported adverse events. No serious adverse events were reported.

interpretationBNT162b2 given as a second dose in individuals prime vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S induced a robust immune response, with an acceptable and manageable reactogenicity profile.

fundingInstituto de Salud Carlos III. TRANSLATIONS: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Immunization, SecondaryAdolescentAdultBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedSpainSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusYoung AdultBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34181880
PMCPMC8233007
OpenAlexW3175995708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.