ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2021
Social and gender determinants related to health inequities in a community in Argentina
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Service Delivery Redesign for Noncommunicable Disease Management: Assessment of Needs and Solutions Through a Co-Creation Process in Argentina.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study analyzes social and gender health realities regarding access to public health systems in the Argentine interior. Objective: to analyze the relationship between social determinants, gender, with inequities of access in frequent users of the public health system in a region of Argentina. Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical study, data collected between March and November 2018 by maximum variation sampling, with analysis of absolute, relative frequencies, standard error, confidence intervals; Multivariate logistic regression analysis with 95% CI and statistical significance of p <0.05. Results: With an n = 345, in an adjusted model, being a woman increased the risk of having problems in accessing the health system 2.2 times more (p = 0.032). People with a primary education level or less are 2.4 times more at risk of paying values equal to or greater than $ 71.4 for health care in the public health system compared to those with a higher educational level (p = 0.000). No statistically significant associations were found between urban / rural location, with the variables of inconveniences in access to health care and out-of-pocket spending. Conclusion: Social inequities measured by level of education and gender have a negative impact on the scope of the right to universal access to health in the analyzed population. It is recommended to review state initiatives that seek to reduce health inequities from a perspective of social and gender determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.