ArticleEpilepsia open2021
Long-term electro-clinical profile of sudden cardiac arrest survivors.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myoclonus After Cardiac Arrest: Need for Standardization-A Systematic Review and Research Proposal on Terminology.Critical care medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term electro-clinical profile of sudden cardiac arrest survivors.Epilepsia open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveRecent research has explored the use of continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring for prognostication of spontaneous cardiac arrest (SCA). However, there is limited literature on the long-term (post-hospital discharge) electrographic findings among SCA survivors and their clinical correlates. Our study aims to fill this critical knowledge gap.
methodsWe retrospectively used our EEG database to identify adults (≥18 years) with SCA history who underwent an outpatient laboratory-based EEG between 01/01/2011 and 12/31/2018. After electronic medical records (EMR) review, patients with epilepsy history and unclear/poorly documented SCA history were excluded. Outpatient EEGs were reviewed by authors. Acute EEG findings were extracted from the EEG database and EMR. In addition, we extracted data on acute and long-term neuroimaging findings (CT/MRI), post-SCA seizures, and anti-seizure medications (ASM) status. Descriptive analysis and Fisher's exact test were performed.
resultsWe included 32 SCA survivors (50% women; mean age = 52.1 ± 13.6 years) in the study. During a median clinical follow-up of 28.2 months, 3 patients suffered only clinical seizures, 3 only chronic post-hypoxic myoclonus, and 5 had both [11 (34.4%) in total]. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) were noted in one-third of the patients, which localized to vertex and frontocentral regions in all but one patient. Five (15.6%) of them did not suffer a clinical seizure despite the presence of EAs. Patients who developed epilepsy were significantly more likely to have abnormal neuroimaging findings [10/11 (90.9%)] during the follow-up compared to the rest of the patients [OR = 25 (95% CI 2.6->100, P = .002)]. Half of the study cohort was taking ASM at the last follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: Our small study reveals a signature location of IEDs in SCA survivors. Neuroimaging abnormalities seem to be a better indicator of epilepsy development, while EEG may reveal markers of potential epileptogenicity in the absence of clinical seizures. Future, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.