Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34181465›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2021

The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy.

Cheyenne Williams, Nabila R Khondakar, Michael A Daneshvar, Luke P O'Connor, Patrick T Gomella, Sherif Mehralivand, Nitin K Yerram, Jillian Egan, Sandeep Gurram, Alexis Rompré-Brodeur and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheyenne WilliamsUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Nabila R KhondakarUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Michael A DaneshvarUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Luke P O'ConnorUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Patrick T GomellaUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sherif MehralivandMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Nitin K YerramUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jillian EganUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sandeep GurramUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alexis Rompré-BrodeurUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bradley R WebsterUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jeunice Owens-WaltonUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Howard ParnesDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Maria J MerinoLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
Prostate Cancer ImagingZ01BC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2005 to 2008
$2.1M
Imaging, image guided biopsy and treatment of prostate cancerZIABC012062 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TÜRKBEY, BARIS · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010655Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011081Intramural NIH HHS ZID BC011242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to evaluate whether bilateral prostate cancer detected at active surveillance (AS) enrollment is associated with progression to Grade Group (GG) ≥2 and to compare the efficacy of combined targeted biopsy plus systematic biopsy (Cbx) vs systematic biopsy (Sbx) or targeted biopsy alone to detect bilateral disease. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospectively maintained database of patients referred to our institution from 2007-2020 was queried. The study cohort included all AS patients with GG1 on confirmatory Cbx and followup of at least 1 year. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified baseline characteristics associated with progression to ≥GG2 at any point throughout followup.

resultsOf 579 patients referred, 103 patients had GG1 on Cbx and were included in the study; 49/103 (47.6%) patients progressed to ≥GG2, with 30/72 (41.7%) patients with unilateral disease progressing and 19/31 (61.3%) patients with bilateral disease progressing. Median time to progression was 68 months vs 52 months for unilateral and bilateral disease, respectively (p=0.006). Both prostate specific antigen density (HR 1.72, p=0.005) and presence of bilateral disease (HR 2.21, p=0.012) on confirmatory biopsy were associated with AS progression. At time of progression, GG and risk group were significantly higher in patients with bilateral versus unilateral disease. Cbx detected 16% more patients with bilateral disease than Sbx alone.

conclusionsBilateral disease and prostate specific antigen density at confirmatory Cbx conferred greater risk of earlier AS progression. Cbx was superior to Sbx for identifying bilateral disease. AS risk-stratification protocols may benefit from including presence of bilateral disease and should use Cbx to detect bilateral disease.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDisease ProgressionHumansImage-Guided BiopsyKallikreinsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm GradingProspective StudiesProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific Antigenmultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingprostatic neoplasmswatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID34181465
PMCPMC10167918
OpenAlexW3175319067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.