ArticleJournal of proteome research2021
Automated Assignment of Proteoform Classification Levels.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Internal Fragment Ions Disambiguate and Increase Identifications in Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteoform identification is required to fully understand the biological diversity present in a sample. However, these identifications are often ambiguous because of the challenges in analyzing full length proteins by mass spectrometry. A five-level proteoform classification system was recently developed to delineate the ambiguity of proteoform identifications and to allow for comparisons across software platforms and acquisition methods. Widespread adoption of this system requires software tools to provide classification of the proteoform identifications. We describe here an implementation of the five-level classification system in the software program MetaMorpheus, which provides both bottom-up and top-down identifications. Additionally, we developed a stand-alone program called ProteoformClassifier that allows users to classify proteoform results from any search program, provided that the program writes output that includes the information necessary to evaluate proteoform ambiguity. This stand-alone program includes a small test file and database to evaluate if a given program provides sufficient information to evaluate ambiguity. If the program does not, then ProteoformClassifier provides meaningful feedback to assist developers with implementing the classification system. We tested currently available top-down software programs and found that none of them (other than MetaMorpheus) provided sufficient information regarding identification ambiguity to permit classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.