ArticleCJEM2022
Investigation and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in older patients with delirium: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian physicians.
Article in CJEM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotics for Delirium in Older Adults With No Clear Urinary Tract Infection: A Multicentre, Pragmatic, Randomized Trial-Vanguard Results.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Trial
- Emergency Department Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Wait Times for Patients With Urologic Conditions.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Guideline Adherence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Management Among Physicians in Jordan: A Cross-sectional Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Delayed Discharge Among Patients Admitted to the Internal Medicine Wards: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Review
- Effect of inpatient antibiotic treatment among older adults with delirium found with a positive urinalysis: a health record review.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Survey on Current Practice of Canadian Physicians Regarding the Investigation in Older Patients with Delirium.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byGeriatrics.2023
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCurrent guidelines suggest assessing non-infectious causes and careful observation before giving antibiotics to delirious patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Our study aims to describe the current practice of Canadian physicians regarding the investigation and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in delirious older patients (aged ≥ 65 years).
methodsOur team of medical experts designed and reviewed a cross-sectional online survey. Study participants were physicians who conduct their clinical practice in Canada and care for older patients with delirium in their current practice. Potential study participants were reached through Canadian associations: Canadian Geriatrics Society, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the Association des Médecins d'Urgence du Québec and members of Choosing Wisely Canada.
results297 physicians were included. The main results show 79.4% of our participants request a urine dipstick or urinalysis in delirious patients and 52.4% immediately order a urine culture with the urinalysis. If bacteriuria is found in delirious but afebrile patients without urinary symptoms, 38% of physicians immediately treat with antibiotics, 33.8% wait for culture before initiating treatment, 14.4% treat if no other cause is found for delirium and only 13.7% would refrain from giving antibiotics. Results from respondents were similar for delirious patients with known cognitive impairment. Participants were almost unanimous (92.5%) in saying they need clear guidelines regarding the treatment of bacteriuria in older delirious patients.
conclusionsThis survey highlights the heterogeneous clinical management of asymptomatic bacteriuria in delirious patients and the need for clear guidelines for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.