ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2021
Comparative analysis of SINC-shaped and SLR pulses performance for contiguous multi-slice fast spin-echo imaging using metamaterial-based MRI.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo comparatively assess the performance of highly selective pulses computed with the SLR algorithm in fast-spin echo (FSE) within the current radiofrequency safety limits using a metamaterial-based coil for wrist magnetic resonance imaging.
methodsApodized SINC pulses commonly used for clinical FSE sequences were considered as a reference. Selective SLR pulses with a time-bandwidth product of four were constructed in the MATPULSE program. Slice selection profiles in conventional T1-weighted and PD-weighted FSE wrist imaging pulse sequences were modeled using a Bloch equations simulator. Signal evolution was assessed in three samples with relaxation times equivalent to those in musculoskeletal tissues at 1.5T. Regular and SLR-based FSE pulse sequences were tested in a phantom experiment in a multi-slice mode with different gaps between slices and the direct saturation effect was investigated.
resultsAs compared to the regular FSEs with a conventional transmit coil, combining the utilization of the metadevice with SLR-based FSEs provided a 23 times lower energy deposition in a duty cycle. When the slice gap was decreased from 100 to 0%, the "slice cross-talk" effect reduced the signal intensity by 15.9-17.6% in the SLR-based and by 22.9-32.3% in the regular T1-weighted FSE; and by 0.0-6.4% in the SLR-based and by 0.3-9.3% in the regular PD-weighted FSE. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionSLR-based FSE together with the metadevice allowed to increase the slice selectivity while still being within the safe SAR limits. The "slice cross-talk" effects were conditioned by the number of echoes in the echo train, the repetition time, and T1 relaxation times. The approach was more beneficial for T1-weighted SLR-based FSE as compared to PD-weighted. The combination of the metadevice and SLR-based FSE offers a promising alternative for MR investigations that require scanning in a "Low-SAR" regime such as those for children, pregnant women, and patients with implanted devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34181118What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.