ReviewClinical oral investigations2021
Platform technologies for regenerative endodontics from multifunctional biomaterials to tooth-on-a-chip strategies.
Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Immunomodulatory and dentinogenic potential of surface-engineered hesperetin-functionalized composite scaffolds for pulp-dentin regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Bilayer gelatin-methacryloyl scaffold for pulp inflammation suppression and dentin-like tissue regeneration.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Article
- Effects of A-PRFInternational journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- More than a trend: the rationale for using bioactive materials in clinical practice.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
- Regenerative endodontic therapy: From laboratory bench to clinical practice.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Regenerative Endodontic Therapies: Harnessing Stem Cells, Scaffolds, and Growth Factors.Polymers · 2025Review
- Anti-inflammatory potential of casein enzymatic hydrolysate/gelatin methacryloyl scaffolds for vital pulp therapy.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Injectable Tissue-Specific Hydrogel System for Pulp-Dentin Regeneration.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review on Organ-on-a-Chip in PDMS or Hydrogel in Dentistry: An Update of the Literature.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advancing Dentistry through Bioprinting: Personalization of Oral Tissues.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Multifunctional and biodegradable methacrylated gelatin/Aloe vera nanofibers for endodontic disinfection and immunomodulation.Biomaterials advances · 2023Article
- Next-generation biomaterials for dental pulp tissue immunomodulation.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2023Review
- Biomechanical Modulation of Dental Pulp Stem Cell (DPSC) Properties for Soft Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Frontiers in Restorative Dentistry Biomaterials and Endodontic Instruments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biomimetic Approaches in Clinical Endodontics.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Electrospun Azithromycin-Laden Gelatin Methacryloyl Fibers for Endodontic Infection Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this review is to highlight recent progress in the field of biomaterials-mediated dental pulp tissue engineering. Specifically, we aim to underscore the critical design criteria of biomaterial platforms that are advantageous for pulp tissue engineering, discuss models for preclinical evaluation, and present new and innovative multifunctional strategies that hold promise for clinical translation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe current article is a comprehensive overview of recent progress over the last 5 years. In detail, we surveyed the literature in regenerative pulp biology, including novel biologic and biomaterials approaches, and those that combined multiple strategies, towards more clinically relevant models. PubMed searches were performed using the keywords: "regenerative dentistry," "dental pulp regeneration," "regenerative endodontics," and "dental pulp therapy."
resultsSignificant contributions to the field of regenerative dentistry have been made in the last 5 years, as evidenced by a significant body of publications. We chose exemplary studies that we believe are progressive towards clinically translatable solutions. We close this review with an outlook towards the future of pulp regeneration strategies and their clinical translation.
conclusionsCurrent clinical treatments lack functional and predictable pulp regeneration and are more focused on the treatment of the consequences of pulp exposure, rather than the restoration of healthy dental pulp. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinically, there is great demand for bioinspired biomaterial strategies that are safe, efficacious, and easy to use, and clinicians are eager for their clinical translation. In particular, we place emphasis on strategies that combine favorable angiogenesis, mineralization, and functional tissue formation, while limiting immune reaction, risk of microbial infection, and pulp necrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.