Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34181052›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2021

Improved Hodgkin-Huxley type model for neural action potentials.

P J Stiles, C G Gray

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P J StilesDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. peter.stiles@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1912-1131
C G GrayDepartment of Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Macquarie University · AUUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simple Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz model for resting-state membrane potentials has been generalized to provide a new nonlinear theoretical model for action potentials in perfused axons. Our minimalistic model appeals naturally to physically based electrodiffusion principles to describe electric-current densities inside sodium and potassium-ion channels whereas the 1952 Hodgkin-Huxley model describes such current densities in an ad hoc way. Although the two models share similar schemes for the kinetics of ion-channel gating, our relaxation times for channel gating are simpler, being independent of membrane potential. Like the theoretical model of Hodgkin and Huxley, based primarily on experimental data at [Formula: see text], our dynamical system behaves as a 4-dimensional resonator exhibiting subthreshold oscillations. Although our present analysis refers to experiments at [Formula: see text], re-parameterizations of this model should permit consideration of action potentials at alternative temperatures. The predicted speed of propagating action potentials in giant axons of squid at [Formula: see text] is in excellent agreement with the Hodgkin-Huxley experimental value at [Formula: see text]. In cases where our model predictions differ from those of the Hodgkin-Huxley model, new experiments will be required to determine which model is more accurate.

Indexed as

AxonsPotassium ChannelsAction PotentialsMembrane PotentialsSodiumPotassium ChannelsSodiumGoldman–Hodgkin–Katz modelNonlinear electrodiffusionOscillatory decay of action potentialsSpeeds of nerve impulses

Identifiers

PMID34181052
OpenAlexW3173892358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.