Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34180989›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

EpitopeVec: linear epitope prediction using deep protein sequence embeddings.

Akash Bahai, Ehsaneddin Asgari, Mohammad R K Mofrad, Andreas Kloetgen, Alice C McHardy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Phylogenetic Domain Adaption for Linear B-Cell Epitope Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Improving B-cell Linear Epitope PredictionCurrent drug targets · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in generative models for antibodies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The rise of taxon-specific epitope predictors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akash BahaiComputational Biology of Infection Research, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-5195
Ehsaneddin AsgariComputational Biology of Infection Research, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6518-7238
Mohammad R K MofradMolecular Cell Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Andreas KloetgenComputational Biology of Infection Research, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.
Alice C McHardyComputational Biology of Infection Research, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig 38124, Germany.
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationB-cell epitopes (BCEs) play a pivotal role in the development of peptide vaccines, immuno-diagnostic reagents and antibody production, and thus in infectious disease prevention and diagnostics in general. Experimental methods used to determine BCEs are costly and time-consuming. Therefore, it is essential to develop computational methods for the rapid identification of BCEs. Although several computational methods have been developed for this task, generalizability is still a major concern, where cross-testing of the classifiers trained and tested on different datasets has revealed accuracies of 51-53%.

resultsWe describe a new method called EpitopeVec, which uses a combination of residue properties, modified antigenicity scales, and protein language model-based representations (protein vectors) as features of peptides for linear BCE predictions. Extensive benchmarking of EpitopeVec and other state-of-the-art methods for linear BCE prediction on several large and small datasets, as well as cross-testing, demonstrated an improvement in the performance of EpitopeVec over other methods in terms of accuracy and area under the curve. As the predictive performance depended on the species origin of the respective antigens (viral, bacterial and eukaryotic), we also trained our method on a large viral dataset to create a dedicated linear viral BCE predictor with improved cross-testing performance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/hzi-bifo/epitope-prediction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AntigensPeptidesAmino Acid SequenceEpitopes, B-LymphocyteSoftwareAntigensEpitopes, B-LymphocytePeptides

Identifiers

PMID34180989
PMCPMC8652027
OpenAlexW3177226227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.