Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34180844›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Improving Smoking and Blood Pressure Outcomes: The Interplay Between Operational Changes and Local Context.

Deborah J Cohen, Shannon M Sweeney, William L Miller, Jennifer D Hall, Edward J Miech, Rachel J Springer, Bijal A Balasubramanian, Laura Damschroder, Miguel Marino

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02560428 (Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02560428 completednot on this map

Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES)

TypeobservationalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2015 to 2022Enrolled7ConditionsProgram EvaluationArmsESCALATES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Deborah J CohenDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon cohendj@ohsu.edu.
Shannon M SweeneyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
William L MillerLehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer D HallDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Edward J MiechRegenstrief Institute, Center for Health Services Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Rachel J SpringerDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Bijal A BalasubramanianDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, Texas.
Laura DamschroderImplementation Pathways, LLC and VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES)R01HS023940 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, DEBORAH JILL · 2015 to 2018
$13.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS023940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe undertook a study to identify conditions and operational changes linked to improvements in smoking and blood pressure (BP) outcomes in primary care.

methodsWe purposively sampled and interviewed practice staff (eg, office managers, clinicians) from a subset of 104 practices participating in EvidenceNOW-a multisite cardiovascular disease prevention initiative. We calculated Clinical Quality Measure improvements, with targets of 10-point or greater absolute improvements in the proportion of patients with smoking screening and, if relevant, counseling and in the proportion of hypertensive patients with adequately controlled BP. We analyzed interview data to identify operational changes, transforming these into numeric data. We used Configurational Comparative Methods to assess the joint effects of multiple factors on outcomes.

resultsIn clinician-owned practices, implementing a workflow to routinely screen, counsel, and connect patients to smoking cessation resources, or implementing a documentation change or a referral to a resource alone led to an improvement of at least 10 points in the smoking outcome with a moderate level of facilitation support. These patterns did not manifest in health- or hospital system-owned practices or in Federally Qualified Health Centers, however. The BP outcome improved by at least 10 points among solo practices after medical assistants were trained to take an accurate BP. Among larger, clinician-owned practices, BP outcomes improved when practices implemented a second BP measurement when the first was elevated, and when staff learned where to document this information in the electronic health record. With 50 hours or more of facilitation, BP outcomes improved among larger and health- and hospital system-owned practices that implemented these operational changes.

conclusionsThere was no magic bullet for improving smoking or BP outcomes. Multiple combinations of operational changes led to improvements, but only in specific contexts of practice size and ownership, or dose of external facilitation.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality ImprovementBlood PressureElectronic Health RecordsHumansSmokingblood pressure managementcardiovascular preventionconfigurational comparative methodsmixed methodsorganizational changepractice-based researchprimary carequality improvementsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID34180844
PMCPMC8118489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.