Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34180607›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2021

Optimized bacterial DNA isolation method for microbiome analysis of human tissues.

Carlijn E Bruggeling, Daniel R Garza, Soumia Achouiti, Wouter Mes, Bas E Dutilh, Annemarie Boleij

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. IntratumoralScience advances · 2026
    Article
  6. Effects of aquaculture practices onApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Carlijn E BruggelingDepartment of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6714-6878
Daniel R GarzaRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Soumia AchouitiDepartment of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter MesDepartment of Animal Ecology & Physiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research (IWWR), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bas E DutilhRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics (CMBI), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-7890
Annemarie BoleijDepartment of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-5880
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in microbiome sequencing have rendered new insights into the role of the microbiome in human health with potential clinical implications. Unfortunately, the presence of host DNA in tissue isolates has hampered the analysis of host-associated bacteria. Here, we present a DNA isolation protocol for tissue, optimized on biopsies from resected human colons (~2-5 mm in size), which includes reduction of human DNA without distortion of relative bacterial abundance at the phylum level. We evaluated which concentrations of Triton and saponin lyse human cells and leave bacterial cells intact, in combination with DNAse treatment to deplete released human DNA. Saponin at a concentration of 0.0125% in PBS lysed host cells, resulting in a 4.5-fold enrichment of bacterial DNA while preserving the relative abundance of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, γ-Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria assessed by qPCR. Our optimized protocol was validated in the setting of two large clinical studies on 521 in vivo acquired colon biopsies of 226 patients using shotgun metagenomics. The resulting bacterial profiles exhibited alpha and beta diversities that are similar to the diversities found by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. A direct comparison between shotgun metagenomics and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of 15 forceps tissue biopsies showed similar bacterial profiles and a similar Shannon diversity index between the sequencing methods. Hereby, we present the first protocol for enriching bacterial DNA from tissue biopsies that allows efficient isolation of all bacteria. Our protocol facilitates analysis of a wide spectrum of bacteria of clinical tissue samples improving their applicability for microbiome research.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaBiopsyColonDNA, BacterialHumansMetagenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial DNA enrichmenttissue microbiome profiling

Identifiers

PMID34180607
PMCPMC8208965
OpenAlexW3169723920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.