Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34180460›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2021

Beneficial and limiting factors in return to work after primary total knee replacement: Patients' perspective.

T M J Pahlplatz, M U Schafroth, C Krijger, T H Hylkema, C N van Dijk, M H W Frings-Dresen, P P F M Kuijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Return to work following knee arthroplasty: a retrospective review in urban Asian population.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T M J PahlplatzAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M U SchafrothAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C KrijgerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
T H HylkemaUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands.
C N van DijkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M H W Frings-DresenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands.
P P F M KuijerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReturn to work (RTW) is an important outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). At present, 70-80%of TKA patients return to work within three to six months.

objectiveWhat are patients' perspectives regarding beneficial and limiting factors in RTW after TKA?

methodsFocus groups were formed in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Three major topics were explored: 1. What was beneficial for RTW after TKA; 2. What was limiting for RTW after TKA; and 3. What additional care would benefit RTW after TKA?

resultsData saturation was reached after four focus groups, comprising 17 participants-nine men and eight women (median age 58, range 52-65). The focus group study identified four main themes that contributed to a successful RTW namely rehabilitation (medical) like post-operative physical therapy, patient characteristics (personal), like motivation to RTW, occupational characteristics (work-related) like build-up in work tasks and medical support (medical) like availability of a walker or crutches.

conclusionAccording to participants, factors within the following four themes can contribute to a successful return to work: occupational, patient, rehabilitation and medical care. Incorporating these factors into the integrated care pathway for the "young" TKA patients may increase the chances of a successful RTW.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchReturn to Workemploymentpatient preferencesreturn to work (RTW)Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID34180460
PMCPMC8385499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.