ArticlePlanta2021
Identification and phylogenetic analysis of five Crataegus species (Rosaceae) based on complete chloroplast genomes.
Article in Planta, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- New generic classification for Korean Peucedanum L. (Apiaceae) species based on deep phylogenomic study.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Chloroplast genome comparison, phylogeny, and molecular evolution of five endemic Potentilla (Rosaceae) species in Mongolia.Genetica · 2026Article
- Plastome evolution and phylogenomics of Glycine (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the complete chloroplast genome of white pomegranate and phylogenetic relationships within Myrtales.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comparative Plastome Analysis ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Complete mitogenome characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of traditional Chinese medicinal plant Tinospora sagittata (Oliv.) Gagnep. from the Menispermaceae family.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Chloroplast Genome Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of Six Medicinal Plants ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic analysis of nineFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Deciphering the multi- partite mitochondrial genome of Crataegus pinnatifida: insights into the evolution and genetics of cultivated Hawthorn.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Plastome evolution of Engelhardia facilitates phylogeny of Juglandaceae.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of seven Juniperus species from Kazakhstan.PloS one · 2024Article
- Comparative genomics and phylogenomics of the genusFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Chloroplast genome structure analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis ofPeerJ · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative study on chloroplast genomes of three Hansenia forbesii varieties (Apiaceae).PloS one · 2023Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of complete chloroplast genomes from sevenFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of the medicinal plantFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionThe chloroplast genomes of the five Crataegus species were shown to have a conserved genome structure. Complete chloroplast genome sequences were more suitable than highly variable regions for the identification and phylogenetic analysis of Crataegus species. Hawthorn, which is commonly used as a traditional Chinese medicine, is one of the most popular sour fruits and has high economic value. Crataegus pinnatifida var. pinnatifida and C. pinnatifida var. major are frequently adulterated with other Crataegus species on the herbal medicine market. However, most Crataegus plants are difficult to identify using traditional morphological methods. Here, we compared five Crataegus chloroplast (CP) genomes comprising two newly sequenced (i.e., C. pinnatifida var. pinnatifida and C. pinnatifida var. major) and three previously published CP genomes. The CP genomes of the five Crataegus species had a conserved genome structure, gene content and codon usage. The total length of the CP genomes was 159,654-159,865 bp. A total of 129-130 genes, including 84-85 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes and 8 rRNA genes, were annotated. Bioinformatics analysis revealed 96-103 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 48-70 long repeats in the five CP genomes. Combining the results of mVISTA and nucleotide diversity, five highly variable regions were screened for species identification and relationship studies. Maximum likelihood trees were constructed on the basis of complete CP genome sequences and highly variable regions. The results showed that the former had higher discriminatory power for Crataegus species, indicating that the complete CP genome could be used as a super-barcode to accurately authenticate the five Crataegus species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.