Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179877›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population.

Paria M Wilson, Beth Rymeski, Xuefeng Xu, William Hardie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. New strategies in the management of pneumothorax.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outcomes of mobilization in the first hour following uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paria M WilsonDepartment of Pediatrics University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-3297
Beth RymeskiDivision of Pediatric Surgery Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Xuefeng XuDepartment of Rheumatology Immunology & Allergy Respiratory Medicine The Children's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine National Clinical Research Center for Child Health Hangzhou China.
William HardieDepartment of Pediatrics University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is a relatively common problem in emergency medicine. The incidence of PSP peaks in adolescence and is most common in tall, thin males. Recent advances in the care of patients with PSP have called into question traditional approaches to management. This clinical review highlights the changing management strategies for PSP and concludes with a proposed evidence-based pathway to guide the care of adolescents with PSP.

Indexed as

adolescentchest tubeevidence‐basedneedle thoracostomyspontaneous pneumothoraxtube thoracostomy

Identifiers

PMID34179877
PMCPMC8212556
OpenAlexW3175034211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.