Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34179871›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2021

Comparison of effect of crush or transection peripheral nerve lesion on lumbar spinal cord synaptic plasticity and microglial dynamics.

Raquel M P Campos, Maria Carolina Barbosa-Silva, Victor T Ribeiro-Resende

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synapse Regulation.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Structural Preservation Does Not Ensure Function at Sensory Ia-Motoneuron Synapses following Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raquel M P CamposInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Laboratório de Neuroquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.
Maria Carolina Barbosa-SilvaInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Laboratório de Neuroquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.
Victor T Ribeiro-ResendeInstituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Laboratório de Neuroquímica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-902, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an injury to the peripheral nervous system, the spinal cord and brain structure reorganize connections to optimize the function of the remaining parts. Many cell events are triggered in the spinal cord to support changes in the synaptic connections around motoneurons, where old connections are removed, and new ones created. Microglial cells are primitive macrophages that invade the central nervous system in early stages of neurodevelopment and have several functions, such as eliminating synapses. We investigated the synaptic plasticity after different types of peripheral (sciatic) nerve injury (crush or total transection), as well as the behavior of microglial cells for 2 weeks after a peripheral lesion. As expected, sciatic-nerve injury reduced motor performance in mice, but crushed animals regained partial motor control. Because of sciatic-nerve injury, pre-synaptic inputs decreased around the motoneurons in the ventro-lateral horn, while microglial cells increased around these cells. Microglial cells also exhibited altered morphology in both types of peripheral lesion, indicating a similar underlying mechanism of plasticity. To investigate the involvement of microglia in this scenario, microglial activation was modulated by daily administration of minocycline. The minocycline treatment directly affected the microglial response and impacted the synapse rearrangement in the spinal cord. Together, these results demonstrate that microglia cells are involved in synaptic plasticity in the lumbar spinal cord in both nerve-injury scenarios. SUMMARY OF STATEMENT: Here, we demonstrated that acute plasticity in the lumbar spinal cord (LSC) did not differ between crush and transection of peripheral nerve, and that microglial reactivity in the LSC was important after both injury types.

Indexed as

Lumbar spinal cordMicrogliaSciatic nerveSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID34179871
PMCPMC8211924
OpenAlexW3163486308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.